Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Predicting Adversarial Examples with High Confidence

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1802.04457 v1 pith:6BEGTMZD submitted 2018-02-13 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords adversarialexamplesconfidencemodelbeenhighoverfittingrandom
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

It has been suggested that adversarial examples cause deep learning models to make incorrect predictions with high confidence. In this work, we take the opposite stance: an overly confident model is more likely to be vulnerable to adversarial examples. This work is one of the most proactive approaches taken to date, as we link robustness with non-calibrated model confidence on noisy images, providing a data-augmentation-free path forward. The adversarial examples phenomenon is most easily explained by the trend of increasing non-regularized model capacity, while the diversity and number of samples in common datasets has remained flat. Test accuracy has incorrectly been associated with true generalization performance, ignoring that training and test splits are often extremely similar in terms of the overall representation space. The transferability property of adversarial examples was previously used as evidence against overfitting arguments, a perceived random effect, but overfitting is not always random.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Explainable AI Approach using Near Misses Analysis

    cs.LG 2024-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A new XAI method clusters a network's most-confused labels into a WordNet-labeled hierarchy, and its experiments suggest larger models form more human-aligned concepts.

Pith tools