REVIEW 2 cited by
Bayesian Uncertainty Estimation for Batch Normalized Deep Networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We show that training a deep network using batch normalization is equivalent to approximate inference in Bayesian models. We further demonstrate that this finding allows us to make meaningful estimates of the model uncertainty using conventional architectures, without modifications to the network or the training procedure. Our approach is thoroughly validated by measuring the quality of uncertainty in a series of empirical experiments on different tasks. It outperforms baselines with strong statistical significance, and displays competitive performance with recent Bayesian approaches.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Bayesian Inference for Large Scale Image Classification
ATMC, a new adaptive-noise MCMC sampler, is reported to outperform SGD baselines in accuracy, log-likelihood, and calibration on Cifar10 and ImageNet, and is claimed to be the first MCMC method to train a neural netwo...
-
U-CAM: Visual Explanation using Uncertainty based Class Activation Maps
U-CAM uses gradients of aleatoric and predictive uncertainty losses to sharpen visual attention maps and improve VQA accuracy over standard baselines.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.