Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Coherent actions by homeomorphisms on the real line or an interval

Group Theory · Submitted 26 Feb 2018

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We establish that such an action is rigid, i.e. any two such actions of the same group are topologically conjugate.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1802.09429 (version 1)
Pith IDQGAJ37EQ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationYash Lodha. "Coherent actions by homeomorphisms on the real line or an interval." arXiv:1802.09429 (2018). https://pith.science/paper/QGAJ37EQ
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 7,042 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.07 · states limitation 0.19 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.09 · compares with prior results 0.66 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We study actions of groups by homeomorphisms on $\mathbf{R}$ (or an interval) that are minimal, have solvable germs at $\pm \infty$ and contain a pair of elements of a certain type. We call such actions coherent. We establish that such an action is rigid, i.e. any two such actions of the same group are topologically conjugate. We also establish that the underlying group is always non elementary amenable, but satisfies that every proper quotient is solvable. As a first application, we demonstrate that any coherent group action $G<Homeo^+(\mathbf{R})$ that produces a nonamenable equivalence relation with respect to the Lebesgue measure satisfies that the underlying group does not embed into Thompson's group $F$. This includes all known examples of nonamenable groups that do not contain non abelian free subgroups and act faithfully on the real line by homeomorphisms. As a second application, we establish that the Brown-Stein-Thompson groups $F(2,p_1,...,p_n)$ for $n\geq 1$ and $p_1,...,p_n$ distinct odd primes, do not embed into Thompson's group $F$. This answers a question recently raised by C. Bleak, M. Brin, and J. Moore. Our tools also allow us to prove additional non embeddability results for Brown-Stein-Thompson and Bieri-Strebel groups.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We study actions of groups by homeomorphisms on $\mathbf{R}$ (or an interval) that are minimal, have solvable germs at $\pm \infty$ and contain a pair of elements of a certain type. contribution 0.91 0.65 0.04 asserted 0.67
s1 We call such actions coherent. contribution 0.59 0.66 0.03 asserted 0.85
s2 We establish that such an action is rigid, i.e. any two such actions of the same group are topologically conjugate. result 1.00 0.96 0.69 asserted 1.00
s3 We also establish that the underlying group is always non elementary amenable, but satisfies that every proper quotient is solvable. result 1.00 0.94 0.18 asserted 1.00
s4 As a first application, we demonstrate that any coherent group action $G<Homeo^+(\mathbf{R})$ that produces a nonamenable equivalence relation with respect to the Lebesgue measure satisfies that the underlying group does not embed into Thompson's group $F$. result 0.89 0.95 0.14 asserted 1.00
s5 This includes all known examples of nonamenable groups that do not contain non abelian free subgroups and act faithfully on the real line by homeomorphisms. interpretation 0.74 0.54 0.07 asserted 0.99
s6 As a second application, we establish that the Brown-Stein-Thompson groups $F(2,p_1,...,p_n)$ for $n\geq 1$ and $p_1,...,p_n$ distinct odd primes, do not embed into Thompson's group $F$. result 0.96 0.95 0.10 asserted 1.00
s7 This answers a question recently raised by C. Bleak, M. Brin, and J. Moore. interpretation 0.37 0.43 0.05 asserted 0.98
s8 Our tools also allow us to prove additional non embeddability results for Brown-Stein-Thompson and Bieri-Strebel groups. result 0.69 0.94 0.05 asserted 0.98

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We study actions of groups by homeomorphisms on $\mathbf{R}$ (or an interval) that are minimal, have solvable germs at $\pm \infty$ and contain a pair of elements of a certain type. We call such actions coherent. We establish that such an action is rigid, i.e. any two such actions of the same group are topologically conjugate. We also establish that the underlying group is always non elementary amenable, but satisfies that every proper quotient is solvable. As a first application, we demonstrate that any coherent group action $G<Homeo^+(\mathbf{R})$ that produces a nonamenable equivalence relation with respect to the Lebesgue measure satisfies that the underlying group does not embed into Thompson's group $F$. This includes all known examples of nonamenable groups that do not contain non abelian free subgroups and act faithfully on the real line by homeomorphisms. As a second application, we establish that the Brown-Stein-Thompson groups $F(2,p_1,...,p_n)$ for $n\geq 1$ and $p_1,...,p_n$ distinct odd primes, do not embed into Thompson's group $F$. This answers a question recently raised by C. Bleak, M. Brin, and J. Moore. Our tools also allow us to prove additional non embeddability results for Brown-Stein-Thompson and Bieri-Strebel groups.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 3 sentences without a confident label

Cites as background 7 papers
  • Such groups were studied extensively in [ref] .

    Chain groups of homeomorphisms of the interval · Examples of coherent actions · 0.99

  • Thompson more than $50$ years ago, and the group is an interesting and important infinite group that has been postulated as a counterexample for various conjectures in group theory (see [ref] for instance.) The subgroup structure of $F$ is quite mysterious and several recent papers (for instance [ref] , [ref] , [ref] and [ref] ) have been devoted to developing a systematic structure theory of subgroups of $F$.

    On subgroups of R. Thompson's group $F$ · Introduction · 1.00

  • Thompson more than $50$ years ago, and the group is an interesting and important infinite group that has been postulated as a counterexample for various conjectures in group theory (see [ref] for instance.) The subgroup structure of $F$ is quite mysterious and several recent papers (for instance [ref] , [ref] , [ref] and [ref] ) have been devoted to developing a systematic structure theory of subgroups of $F$.

    The generation problem in Thompson group $F$ · Introduction · 1.00

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.