Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

CliNER 2.0: Accessible and Accurate Clinical Concept Extraction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1803.02245 v1 pith:4ZXLSD54 submitted 2018-03-06 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords clinicalclinerconceptextractionmodelsnamednotestasks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Clinical notes often describe important aspects of a patient's stay and are therefore critical to medical research. Clinical concept extraction (CCE) of named entities - such as problems, tests, and treatments - aids in forming an understanding of notes and provides a foundation for many downstream clinical decision-making tasks. Historically, this task has been posed as a standard named entity recognition (NER) sequence tagging problem, and solved with feature-based methods using handengineered domain knowledge. Recent advances, however, have demonstrated the efficacy of LSTM-based models for NER tasks, including CCE. This work presents CliNER 2.0, a simple-to-install, open-source tool for extracting concepts from clinical text. CliNER 2.0 uses a word- and character- level LSTM model, and achieves state-of-the-art performance. For ease of use, the tool also includes pre-trained models available for public use.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Aligning Proteins and Language: A Foundation Model for Protein Retrieval

    q-bio.BM 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A CLIP-style model aligns protein surface point clouds with GO-derived captions and achieves roughly 60% Top-5 zero-shot retrieval on PDB and 36% on EMDB.

Pith tools