Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Improved Dynamic Geodesic Nearest Neighbor Searching in a Simple Polygon

Computational Geometry · Submitted 15 Mar 2018

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Our data structure achieves polylogarithmic update and query times, and uses $O(n\log^3n\log m + m)$ space, where $n$ is the number of sites in $S$ and $m$ is the number of vertices in $P$.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1803.05765 (version 1)
Pith ID57DRKZ7T, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationFrank Staals, Lars Arge, Pankaj K. Agarwal. "Improved Dynamic Geodesic Nearest Neighbor Searching in a Simple Polygon." arXiv:1803.05765 (2018). https://pith.science/paper/57DRKZ7T
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,976 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.15 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.97 · compares with prior results 0.06 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We present an efficient dynamic data structure that supports geodesic nearest neighbor queries for a set $S$ of point sites in a static simple polygon $P$. Our data structure allows us to insert a new site in $S$, delete a site from $S$, and ask for the site in $S$ closest to an arbitrary query point $q \in P$. All distances are measured using the geodesic distance, that is, the length of the shortest path that is completely contained in $P$. Our data structure achieves polylogarithmic update and query times, and uses $O(n\log^3n\log m + m)$ space, where $n$ is the number of sites in $S$ and $m$ is the number of vertices in $P$. The crucial ingredient in our data structure is an implicit representation of a vertical shallow cutting of the geodesic distance functions. We show that such an implicit representation exists, and that we can compute it efficiently.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We present an efficient dynamic data structure that supports geodesic nearest neighbor queries for a set $S$ of point sites in a static simple polygon $P$. contribution 1.00 0.94 0.44 asserted 1.00
s1 Our data structure allows us to insert a new site in $S$, delete a site from $S$, and ask for the site in $S$ closest to an arbitrary query point $q \in P$. contribution 0.93 0.88 0.09 asserted 1.00
s2 All distances are measured using the geodesic distance, that is, the length of the shortest path that is completely contained in $P$. background 0.81 0.23 0.04 asserted 1.00
s3 Our data structure achieves polylogarithmic update and query times, and uses $O(n\log^3n\log m + m)$ space, where $n$ is the number of sites in $S$ and $m$ is the number of vertices in $P$. result 0.85 0.95 0.57 asserted 1.00
s4 The crucial ingredient in our data structure is an implicit representation of a vertical shallow cutting of the geodesic distance functions. method 0.83 0.86 0.14 asserted 1.00
s5 We show that such an implicit representation exists, and that we can compute it efficiently. contribution 0.66 0.95 0.13 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.97 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We present an efficient dynamic data structure that supports geodesic nearest neighbor queries for a set $S$ of point sites in a static simple polygon $P$. Our data structure allows us to insert a new site in $S$, delete a site from $S$, and ask for the site in $S$ closest to an arbitrary query point $q \in P$. All distances are measured using the geodesic distance, that is, the length of the shortest path that is completely contained in $P$. Our data structure achieves polylogarithmic update and query times, and uses $O(n\log^3n\log m + m)$ space, where $n$ is the number of sites in $S$ and $m$ is the number of vertices in $P$. The crucial ingredient in our data structure is an implicit representation of a vertical shallow cutting of the geodesic distance functions. We show that such an implicit representation exists, and that we can compute it efficiently.

Human review
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 4 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 3 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 1 paper
  • Therefore, we can use the exactly the same machinery as in Agarwal, Arge, and Staals [ref] , we compute $S'$ in $O(n(logn + log^2 m)$, time and then construct $$ in additional $O(nlog^2 m)$ time.

    Nearest Neighbor Searching in a Dynamic Simple Polygon · $$ as an Hamiltonian abstract Voronoi diagram · 0.96

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.