RECORD
Proving a conjecture on chromatic polynomials by counting the number of acyclic orientations
Combinatorics · Submitted 23 Mar 2018
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim In this article, we confirm and strengthen a conjecture proposed by Lundow and Markstr\"{o}m in 2006 that $\epsilon(T_n)< \epsilon(G)<\epsilon(K_n)$ holds for any connected graph $G$ of order $n$ which is neither the complete graph $K_n$ nor a tree $T_n$ of order $n$.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
The chromatic polynomial $P(G,x)$ of a graph $G$ of order $n$ can be expressed as $\sum\limits_{i=1}^n(-1)^{n-i}a_{i}x^i$, where $a_i$ is interpreted as the number of broken-cycle free spanning subgraphs of $G$ with exactly $i$ components. The parameter $\epsilon(G)=\sum\limits_{i=1}^n (n-i)a_i/\sum\limits_{i=1}^n a_i$ is the mean size of a broken-cycle-free spanning subgraph of $G$. In this article, we confirm and strengthen a conjecture proposed by Lundow and Markstr\"{o}m in 2006 that $\epsilon(T_n)< \epsilon(G)<\epsilon(K_n)$ holds for any connected graph $G$ of order $n$ which is neither the complete graph $K_n$ nor a tree $T_n$ of order $n$. The most crucial step of our proof is to obtain the interpretation of all $a_i$'s by the number of acyclic orientations of $G$.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | The chromatic polynomial $P(G,x)$ of a graph $G$ of order $n$ can be expressed as $\sum\limits_{i=1}^n(-1)^{n-i}a_{i}x^i$, where $a_i$ is interpreted as the number of broken-cycle free spanning subgraphs of $G$ with exactly $i$ components. | background 1.00 | 0.10 | 0.03 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | The parameter $\epsilon(G)=\sum\limits_{i=1}^n (n-i)a_i/\sum\limits_{i=1}^n a_i$ is the mean size of a broken-cycle-free spanning subgraph of $G$. | background 0.81 | 0.26 | 0.03 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | In this article, we confirm and strengthen a conjecture proposed by Lundow and Markstr\"{o}m in 2006 that $\epsilon(T_n)< \epsilon(G)<\epsilon(K_n)$ holds for any connected graph $G$ of order $n$ which is neither the complete graph $K_n$ nor a tree $T_n$ of order $n$. | result 0.56 | 0.90 | 0.94 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | The most crucial step of our proof is to obtain the interpretation of all $a_i$'s by the number of acyclic orientations of $G$. | method 0.90 | 0.94 | 0.05 | asserted 1.00 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v3
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
The chromatic polynomial $P(G,x)$ of a graph $G$ of order $n$ can be expressed as $\sum\limits_{i=1}^n(-1)^{n-i}a_{i}x^i$, where $a_i$ is interpreted as the number of broken-cycle free spanning subgraphs of $G$ with exactly $i$ components. The parameter $\epsilon(G)=\sum\limits_{i=1}^n (n-i)a_i/\sum\limits_{i=1}^n a_i$ is the mean size of a broken-cycle-free spanning subgraph of $G$. In this article, we confirm and strengthen a conjecture proposed by Lundow and Markstr\"{o}m in 2006 that $\epsilon(T_n)< \epsilon(G)<\epsilon(K_n)$ holds for any connected graph $G$ of order $n$ which is neither the complete graph $K_n$ nor a tree $T_n$ of order $n$. The most crucial step of our proof is to obtain the interpretation of all $a_i$'s by the number of acyclic orientations of $G$.
Human review
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.