Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Determinantal Point Processes for Coresets

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1803.08700 v3 pith:DCJUEWZF submitted 2018-03-23 stat.ML cs.DScs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.DScs.LG
keywords coresetcoresetspointprocessessamplessamplingcomescost
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

When faced with a data set too large to be processed all at once, an obvious solution is to retain only part of it. In practice this takes a wide variety of different forms, and among them "coresets" are especially appealing. A coreset is a (small) weighted sample of the original data that comes with the following guarantee: a cost function can be evaluated on the smaller set instead of the larger one, with low relative error. For some classes of problems, and via a careful choice of sampling distribution (based on the so-called "sensitivity" metric), iid random sampling has turned to be one of the most successful methods for building coresets efficiently. However, independent samples are sometimes overly redundant, and one could hope that enforcing diversity would lead to better performance. The difficulty lies in proving coreset properties in non-iid samples. We show that the coreset property holds for samples formed with determinantal point processes (DPP). DPPs are interesting because they are a rare example of repulsive point processes with tractable theoretical properties, enabling us to prove general coreset theorems. We apply our results to both the k-means and the linear regression problems, and give extensive empirical evidence that the small additional computational cost of DPP sampling comes with superior performance over its iid counterpart. Of independent interest, we also provide analytical formulas for the sensitivity in the linear regression and 1-means cases.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Tight Sensitivity Bounds For Smaller Coresets

    cs.LG 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    New algorithms compute provably tight sensitivity bounds for matrix rows, yielding smaller coresets for LMS approximation of affine k-subspaces via an iterative exact method and a dimensionality-reduction trick.

Pith tools