Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

French Word Recognition through a Quick Survey on Recurrent Neural Networks Using Long-Short Term Memory RNN-LSTM

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1804.03683 v1 pith:2KEFGIC4 submitted 2018-04-10 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords rnn-lstmtrainedwereaccuracycharactersdeepfontsfrench
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Optical character recognition (OCR) is a fundamental problem in computer vision. Research studies have shown significant progress in classifying printed characters using deep learning-based methods and topologies. Among current algorithms, recurrent neural networks with long-short term memory blocks called RNN-LSTM have provided the highest performance in terms of accuracy rate. Using the top 5,000 French words collected from the internet including all signs and accents, RNN-LSTM models were trained and tested for several cases. Six fonts were used to generate OCR samples and an additional dataset that included all samples from these six fonts was prepared for training and testing purposes. The trained RNN-LSTM models were tested and achieved the accuracy rates of 99.98798% and 99.91889% for edit distance and sequence error, respectively. An accurate preprocessing followed by height normalization (standardization methods in deep learning) enabled the RNN-LSTM model to be trained in the most efficient way. This machine learning work also revealed the robustness of RNN-LSTM topology to recognize printed characters.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Evaluating Generative AI-Enhanced Content: A Conceptual Framework Using Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed-Methods Approaches

    cs.CL 2024-11 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A conceptual position paper argues that qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods research can assess GenAI's impact on scientific writing, but it offers no new results.

Pith tools