REVIEW 1 cited by
Efficient Solvers for Sparse Subspace Clustering
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Sparse subspace clustering (SSC) clusters $n$ points that lie near a union of low-dimensional subspaces. The SSC model expresses each point as a linear or affine combination of the other points, using either $\ell_1$ or $\ell_0$ regularization. Using $\ell_1$ regularization results in a convex problem but requires $O(n^2)$ storage, and is typically solved by the alternating direction method of multipliers which takes $O(n^3)$ flops. The $\ell_0$ model is non-convex but only needs memory linear in $n$, and is solved via orthogonal matching pursuit and cannot handle the case of affine subspaces. This paper shows that a proximal gradient framework can solve SSC, covering both $\ell_1$ and $\ell_0$ models, and both linear and affine constraints. For both $\ell_1$ and $\ell_0$, algorithms to compute the proximity operator in the presence of affine constraints have not been presented in the SSC literature, so we derive an exact and efficient algorithm that solves the $\ell_1$ case with just $O(n^2)$ flops. In the $\ell_0$ case, our algorithm retains the low-memory overhead, and is the first algorithm to solve the SSC-$\ell_0$ model with affine constraints. Experiments show our algorithms do not rely on sensitive regularization parameters, and they are less sensitive to sparsity misspecification and high noise.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Large-Scale Sparse Subspace Clustering Using Landmarks
FSC selects m landmarks, builds an m-by-n sparse coefficient matrix, and derives the spectral embedding from its SVD, so both sparse coding and spectral clustering scale linearly with data size.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.