pith. sign in

arxiv: 1804.07056 · v1 · pith:EF2MD3QQnew · submitted 2018-04-19 · 💻 cs.CV

Now you see me: evaluating performance in long-term visual tracking

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords long-termtrackingperformanceevaluationevaluatingmethodologytrackersanalysis
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We propose a new long-term tracking performance evaluation methodology and present a new challenging dataset of carefully selected sequences with many target disappearances. We perform an extensive evaluation of six long-term and nine short-term state-of-the-art trackers, using new performance measures, suitable for evaluating long-term tracking - tracking precision, recall and F-score. The evaluation shows that a good model update strategy and the capability of image-wide re-detection are critical for long-term tracking performance. We integrated the methodology in the VOT toolkit to automate experimental analysis and benchmarking and to facilitate the development of long-term trackers.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CDTB: A Color and Depth Visual Object Tracking Dataset and Benchmark

    cs.CV 2019-07 accept novelty 7.0

    Introduces the CDTB dataset, new long-term tracking performance measures that generalize short-term ones, and a taxonomy positioning trackers on the short-to-long-term spectrum.