Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On the representation of Boolean and real functions as Hamiltonians for quantum computing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1804.09130 v2 pith:QTWXBZ33 submitted 2018-04-24 quant-ph

classification quant-ph
keywords hamiltoniansfunctionsquantumbooleanoperatorsrepresentingapplicationsfunction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Mapping functions on bits to Hamiltonians acting on qubits has many applications in quantum computing. In particular, Hamiltonians representing Boolean functions are required for applications of quantum annealing or the quantum approximate optimization algorithm to combinatorial optimization problems. We show how such functions are naturally represented by Hamiltonians given as sums of Pauli $Z$ operators (Ising spin operators) with the terms of the sum corresponding to the function's Fourier expansion. For many classes of functions which are given by a compact description, such as a Boolean formula in conjunctive normal form that gives an instance of the satisfiability problem, it is #P-hard to compute its Hamiltonian representation. On the other hand, no such difficulty exists generally for constructing Hamiltonians representing a real function such as a sum of local Boolean clauses. We give composition rules for explicitly constructing Hamiltonians representing a wide variety of Boolean and real functions by combining Hamiltonians representing simpler clauses as building blocks. We apply our results to the construction of controlled-unitary operators, and to the special case of operators that compute function values in an ancilla qubit register. Finally, we outline several additional applications and extensions of our results. A primary goal of this paper is to provide a $\textit{design toolkit for quantum optimization}$ which may be utilized by experts and practitioners alike in the construction and analysis of new quantum algorithms, and at the same time to demystify the various constructions appearing in the literature.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Optimizing quantum heuristics with meta-learning

    quant-ph 2019-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A gradient-based LSTM meta-learner outperforms L-BFGS-B, Bayesian optimization, evolutionary strategies, and Nelder-Mead at tuning QAOA and VQE parameters in simulated noisy settings.

Pith tools