REVIEW 1 cited by
Commonsense mining as knowledge base completion? A study on the impact of novelty
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Commonsense knowledge bases such as ConceptNet represent knowledge in the form of relational triples. Inspired by the recent work by Li et al., we analyse if knowledge base completion models can be used to mine commonsense knowledge from raw text. We propose novelty of predicted triples with respect to the training set as an important factor in interpreting results. We critically analyse the difficulty of mining novel commonsense knowledge, and show that a simple baseline method outperforms the previous state of the art on predicting more novel.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Commonsense Knowledge Mining from Pretrained Models
A masked-language-model pointwise mutual information score, with no fine-tuning on commonsense databases, matches or beats supervised baselines when mining novel Wikipedia triples, though the evaluation is weakened by...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.