Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Commonsense mining as knowledge base completion? A study on the impact of novelty

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1804.09259 v1 pith:4AK2BZTR submitted 2018-04-24 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords knowledgecommonsenseanalysebasecompletionminingnovelnovelty
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Commonsense knowledge bases such as ConceptNet represent knowledge in the form of relational triples. Inspired by the recent work by Li et al., we analyse if knowledge base completion models can be used to mine commonsense knowledge from raw text. We propose novelty of predicted triples with respect to the training set as an important factor in interpreting results. We critically analyse the difficulty of mining novel commonsense knowledge, and show that a simple baseline method outperforms the previous state of the art on predicting more novel.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Commonsense Knowledge Mining from Pretrained Models

    cs.CL 2019-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A masked-language-model pointwise mutual information score, with no fine-tuning on commonsense databases, matches or beats supervised baselines when mining novel Wikipedia triples, though the evaluation is weakened by...

Pith tools