Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Obligation and Prohibition Extraction Using Hierarchical RNNs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1805.03871 v1 pith:HCIKK5DT submitted 2018-05-10 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords hierarchicalbilstmsentencetaskallowingapartbecausebroader
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider the task of detecting contractual obligations and prohibitions. We show that a self-attention mechanism improves the performance of a BILSTM classifier, the previous state of the art for this task, by allowing it to focus on indicative tokens. We also introduce a hierarchical BILSTM, which converts each sentence to an embedding, and processes the sentence embeddings to classify each sentence. Apart from being faster to train, the hierarchical BILSTM outperforms the flat one, even when the latter considers surrounding sentences, because the hierarchical model has a broader discourse view.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Computational Identification of Regulatory Statements in EU Legislation

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A dependency-parsing method and a LEGAL-BERT-based classifier both reach roughly 80-84% accuracy for identifying regulatory statements in EU law on a new 7,200-sentence dataset, with a Krippendorff's alpha of 0.58 bet...

Pith tools