Pith. sign in

REVIEW

On the approximation guarantee of obviously strategyproof mechanisms

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1805.04190 v2 pith:J76ACLUS submitted 2018-05-10 cs.GT

classification cs.GT
keywords mechanismsapproximationdesignguaranteenovelobviouslyparadigmsresearch
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Catering to the incentives of people with limited rationality is a challenging research direction that requires novel paradigms to design mechanisms and approximation algorithms. Obviously strategyproof (OSP) mechanisms have recently emerged as the concept of interest to this research agenda. However, the majority of the literature in the area has either highlighted the shortcomings of OSP or focused on the "right" definition rather than on the construction of these mechanisms. We here give the first set of tight results on the approximation guarantee of OSP mechanisms for scheduling related machines and a characterization of optimal OSP mechanisms for set system problems. By extending the well-known cycle monotonicity technique, we are able to concentrate on the algorithmic component of OSP mechanisms and provide some novel paradigms for their design.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools