REVIEW 2 cited by
Stress Test Evaluation for Natural Language Inference
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Natural language inference (NLI) is the task of determining if a natural language hypothesis can be inferred from a given premise in a justifiable manner. NLI was proposed as a benchmark task for natural language understanding. Existing models perform well at standard datasets for NLI, achieving impressive results across different genres of text. However, the extent to which these models understand the semantic content of sentences is unclear. In this work, we propose an evaluation methodology consisting of automatically constructed "stress tests" that allow us to examine whether systems have the ability to make real inferential decisions. Our evaluation of six sentence-encoder models on these stress tests reveals strengths and weaknesses of these models with respect to challenging linguistic phenomena, and suggests important directions for future work in this area.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Linguistics and Human Brain: A Perspective of Computational Neuroscience
A narrative review arguing that computational neuroscience, powered by LLM-based model–brain alignment, serves as the bridge between linguistic theory and neural data.
-
From Superficial Patterns to Semantic Understanding: Fine-Tuning Language Models on Contrast Sets
Fine-tuning ELECTRA-small on a 20% subsample of a contrast set raises held-out contrast set accuracy from 74.9% to 90.7% without hurting SNLI accuracy.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.