Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Conservative Exploration using Interleaving

Machine Learning · Submitted 3 Jun 2018

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Our real-world experiments show that our algorithms can learn to recommend K most attractive movies without ever violating a strict production constraint, both overall and subject to a diversity constraint.

how it is stated · asserted 0.97 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1806.00892 (version 1)
Pith ID45BBJE7V, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationBranislav Kveton, Sumeet Katariya, Vamsi K. Potluru, Zheng Wen. "Conservative Exploration using Interleaving." arXiv:1806.00892 (2018). https://pith.science/paper/45BBJE7V
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,893 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.54 · human participants 0.15 · controlled comparison 0.29 · randomized assignment 0.03 · states quantitative result 0.23 · compares with prior results 0.13 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

In many practical problems, a learning agent may want to learn the best action in hindsight without ever taking a bad action, which is significantly worse than the default production action. In general, this is impossible because the agent has to explore unknown actions, some of which can be bad, to learn better actions. However, when the actions are combinatorial, this may be possible if the unknown action can be evaluated by interleaving it with the production action. We formalize this concept as learning in stochastic combinatorial semi-bandits with exchangeable actions. We design efficient learning algorithms for this problem, bound their n-step regret, and evaluate them on both synthetic and real-world problems. Our real-world experiments show that our algorithms can learn to recommend K most attractive movies without ever violating a strict production constraint, both overall and subject to a diversity constraint.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 In many practical problems, a learning agent may want to learn the best action in hindsight without ever taking a bad action, which is significantly worse than the default production action. background 1.00 0.07 0.05 hedged possibility 0.95
s1 In general, this is impossible because the agent has to explore unknown actions, some of which can be bad, to learn better actions. background 0.93 0.08 0.03 asserted 0.98
s2 However, when the actions are combinatorial, this may be possible if the unknown action can be evaluated by interleaving it with the production action. background 0.66 0.11 0.28 hedged possibility 0.99
s3 We formalize this concept as learning in stochastic combinatorial semi-bandits with exchangeable actions. contribution 0.61 0.77 0.07 asserted 0.98
s4 We design efficient learning algorithms for this problem, bound their n-step regret, and evaluate them on both synthetic and real-world problems. contribution 0.96 0.97 0.10 asserted 0.99
s5 Our real-world experiments show that our algorithms can learn to recommend K most attractive movies without ever violating a strict production constraint, both overall and subject to a diversity constraint. result 1.00 0.97 0.70 asserted 0.97

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.86.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

In many practical problems, a learning agent may want to learn the best action in hindsight without ever taking a bad action, which is significantly worse than the default production action. In general, this is impossible because the agent has to explore unknown actions, some of which can be bad, to learn better actions. However, when the actions are combinatorial, this may be possible if the unknown action can be evaluated by interleaving it with the production action. We formalize this concept as learning in stochastic combinatorial semi-bandits with exchangeable actions. We design efficient learning algorithms for this problem, bound their n-step regret, and evaluate them on both synthetic and real-world problems. Our real-world experiments show that our algorithms can learn to recommend K most attractive movies without ever violating a strict production constraint, both overall and subject to a diversity constraint.

Human review
How the literature uses it

2 arXiv papers cite this in 2 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 1 sentence without a confident label

Cites it as background 1 paper

What it cites · 5 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
Compares with 1 paper
  • In <ref>, we solve two recommendation problems using $$, and validate that its regret is no higher than $K-1$ times that of a non-conservative matroid bandit algorithm $$ [ref] . $$ violates our conservative constraint multiple times.

    Matroid Bandits: Fast Combinatorial Optimization with Learning · Experiments · 0.97

Cites as background 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.