REVIEW 2 cited by
Digging Into Self-Supervised Monocular Depth Estimation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Per-pixel ground-truth depth data is challenging to acquire at scale. To overcome this limitation, self-supervised learning has emerged as a promising alternative for training models to perform monocular depth estimation. In this paper, we propose a set of improvements, which together result in both quantitatively and qualitatively improved depth maps compared to competing self-supervised methods. Research on self-supervised monocular training usually explores increasingly complex architectures, loss functions, and image formation models, all of which have recently helped to close the gap with fully-supervised methods. We show that a surprisingly simple model, and associated design choices, lead to superior predictions. In particular, we propose (i) a minimum reprojection loss, designed to robustly handle occlusions, (ii) a full-resolution multi-scale sampling method that reduces visual artifacts, and (iii) an auto-masking loss to ignore training pixels that violate camera motion assumptions. We demonstrate the effectiveness of each component in isolation, and show high quality, state-of-the-art results on the KITTI benchmark.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Edit in 2D, Verify in 3D: Reinforcement Learning for Multi-view Consistent Scene Editing
RL3DEdit fine-tunes FLUX-Kontext with GRPO using VGGT confidence and pose rewards to produce multi-view consistent 3D scene edits in a single pass.
-
StixelNExT++: Lightweight Monocular Scene Segmentation and Representation for Collective Perception
A monocular neural network predicts 3D Stixels directly from RGB images in about 10 ms, with a self-defined Waymo evaluation showing competitive performance within 30 m.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.