Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Comment on Implications of new physics in the decays $B_c \to (J/\psi,\eta_c)\tau\nu$

High Energy Physics - Lattice · Submitted 7 Jun 2018

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We note that this matrix element can be determined using existing lattice QCD results.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.57 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1806.02586 (version 1)
Pith IDPAMOLE5K, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationChristine Davies, Craig McNeile. "Comment on Implications of new physics in the decays $B_c \to (J/\psi,\eta_c)\tau\nu$." arXiv:1806.02586 (2018). https://pith.science/paper/PAMOLE5K
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,384 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.20 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.05 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.59 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

As part of a study BSM corrections to leptonic decays of the $B_c$ meson, Tran et al. (arXiv:1801.06927) use the covariant confining quark model (CCQM) to estimate the matrix element of the pseudo-scalar curent between the vacuum and the $B_c$ meson. We note that this matrix element can be determined using existing lattice QCD results.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 As part of a study BSM corrections to leptonic decays of the $B_c$ meson, Tran et al. (arXiv:1801.06927) use the covariant confining quark model (CCQM) to estimate the matrix element of the pseudo-scalar curent between the vacuum and the $B_c$ meson. background 0.96 0.05 0.06 asserted 1.00
s1 We note that this matrix element can be determined using existing lattice QCD results. background 0.29 0.10 0.34 hedged possibility 0.57

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: position or commentary 1.00 · evidence from literature 0.69.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

As part of a study BSM corrections to leptonic decays of the $B_c$ meson, Tran et al. (arXiv:1801.06927) use the covariant confining quark model (CCQM) to estimate the matrix element of the pseudo-scalar curent between the vacuum and the $B_c$ meson. We note that this matrix element can be determined using existing lattice QCD results.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 15 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 2 papers
Uses data or values from 4 papers
Compares with 1 paper
Cites as background 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.