Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Uncertainty-driven Sanity Check: Application to Postoperative Brain Tumor Cavity Segmentation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1806.03106 v1 pith:X4N64YK5 submitted 2018-06-08 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords segmentationcheckmethodmodelsanityuncertaintyadditionalbrain
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Uncertainty estimates of modern neuronal networks provide additional information next to the computed predictions and are thus expected to improve the understanding of the underlying model. Reliable uncertainties are particularly interesting for safety-critical computer-assisted applications in medicine, e.g., neurosurgical interventions and radiotherapy planning. We propose an uncertainty-driven sanity check for the identification of segmentation results that need particular expert review. Our method uses a fully-convolutional neural network and computes uncertainty estimates by the principle of Monte Carlo dropout. We evaluate the performance of the proposed method on a clinical dataset with 30 postoperative brain tumor images. The method can segment the highly inhomogeneous resection cavities accurately (Dice coefficients 0.792 $\pm$ 0.154). Furthermore, the proposed sanity check is able to detect the worst segmentation and three out of the four outliers. The results highlight the potential of using the additional information from the model's parameter uncertainty to validate the segmentation performance of a deep learning model.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality

    cs.CV 2025-05 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A Bayesian ordinal classifier with calibrated uncertainty thresholds is proposed for radiotherapy auto-contour QA, but the reported high accuracy is undermined by a missing majority-class baseline in a 93.1% Class 2 test set.

Pith tools