Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Efficient Active Learning for Image Classification and Segmentation using a Sample Selection and Conditional Generative Adversarial Network

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1806.05473 v4 pith:OIB4WU3W submitted 2018-06-14 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords imagelearningtrainingactiveadversarialclassificationconditionaldifferent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Training robust deep learning (DL) systems for medical image classification or segmentation is challenging due to limited images covering different disease types and severity. We propose an active learning (AL) framework to select most informative samples and add to the training data. We use conditional generative adversarial networks (cGANs) to generate realistic chest xray images with different disease characteristics by conditioning its generation on a real image sample. Informative samples to add to the training set are identified using a Bayesian neural network. Experiments show our proposed AL framework is able to achieve state of the art performance by using about 35% of the full dataset, thus saving significant time and effort over conventional methods.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Deep Active Learning for Lung Disease Severity Classification from Chest X-rays: Learning with Less Data in the Presence of Class Imbalance

    eess.IV 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Simple uncertainty-based active learning with a weighted loss matched full-data COVID-19 CXR severity classifiers using 15.4% (binary) and 23.1% (multi-class) of training labels.

Pith tools