Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Inference in Deep Gaussian Processes using Stochastic Gradient Hamiltonian Monte Carlo

Machine Learning · Submitted 14 Jun 2018

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Thus our method establishes a new state-of-the-art for inference in DGPs.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1806.05490 (version 3)
Pith IDCM6DONRS, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationJos\'e Miguel Hern\'andez-Lobato, Juan Jos\'e Murillo-Fuentes, Marton Havasi. "Inference in Deep Gaussian Processes using Stochastic Gradient Hamiltonian Monte Carlo." arXiv:1806.05490 (2018). https://pith.science/paper/CM6DONRS
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,069 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.10 · states limitation 0.11 · human participants 0.03 · controlled comparison 0.63 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.95 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Deep Gaussian Processes (DGPs) are hierarchical generalizations of Gaussian Processes that combine well calibrated uncertainty estimates with the high flexibility of multilayer models. One of the biggest challenges with these models is that exact inference is intractable. The current state-of-the-art inference method, Variational Inference (VI), employs a Gaussian approximation to the posterior distribution. This can be a potentially poor unimodal approximation of the generally multimodal posterior. In this work, we provide evidence for the non-Gaussian nature of the posterior and we apply the Stochastic Gradient Hamiltonian Monte Carlo method to generate samples. To efficiently optimize the hyperparameters, we introduce the Moving Window MCEM algorithm. This results in significantly better predictions at a lower computational cost than its VI counterpart. Thus our method establishes a new state-of-the-art for inference in DGPs.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Deep Gaussian Processes (DGPs) are hierarchical generalizations of Gaussian Processes that combine well calibrated uncertainty estimates with the high flexibility of multilayer models. background 1.00 0.06 0.03 asserted 1.00
s1 One of the biggest challenges with these models is that exact inference is intractable. background 0.89 0.08 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 The current state-of-the-art inference method, Variational Inference (VI), employs a Gaussian approximation to the posterior distribution. background 0.99 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s3 This can be a potentially poor unimodal approximation of the generally multimodal posterior. background 0.73 0.10 0.03 hedged possibility 0.91
s4 In this work, we provide evidence for the non-Gaussian nature of the posterior and we apply the Stochastic Gradient Hamiltonian Monte Carlo method to generate samples. contribution 0.87 0.95 0.12 asserted 1.00
s5 To efficiently optimize the hyperparameters, we introduce the Moving Window MCEM algorithm. method 0.67 0.94 0.04 asserted 1.00
s6 This results in significantly better predictions at a lower computational cost than its VI counterpart. result 0.99 0.92 0.29 asserted 1.00
s7 Thus our method establishes a new state-of-the-art for inference in DGPs. result 0.57 0.82 0.83 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.94.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Deep Gaussian Processes (DGPs) are hierarchical generalizations of Gaussian Processes that combine well calibrated uncertainty estimates with the high flexibility of multilayer models. One of the biggest challenges with these models is that exact inference is intractable. The current state-of-the-art inference method, Variational Inference (VI), employs a Gaussian approximation to the posterior distribution. This can be a potentially poor unimodal approximation of the generally multimodal posterior. In this work, we provide evidence for the non-Gaussian nature of the posterior and we apply the Stochastic Gradient Hamiltonian Monte Carlo method to generate samples. To efficiently optimize the hyperparameters, we introduce the Moving Window MCEM algorithm. This results in significantly better predictions at a lower computational cost than its VI counterpart. Thus our method establishes a new state-of-the-art for inference in DGPs.

Human review
How the literature uses it

3 arXiv papers cite this in 3 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 2 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as support 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.