Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Optimal Market Making in the Presence of Latency

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1806.05849 v3 pith:Z5C2QNGB submitted 2018-06-15 q-fin.TR

classification q-fin.TR
keywords marketlatencymakermakingmodeloptimalorderspresence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper studies optimal market making for large-tick assets in the presence of latency. We consider a random walk model for the asset price, and formulate the market maker's optimization problem using Markov Decision Processes (MDP). We characterize the value of an order and show that it plays the role of one-period reward in the MDP model. Based on this characterization, we provide explicit criteria for assessing the profitability of market making when there is latency. Under our model, we show that a market maker can earn a positive expected profit if there are sufficient uninformed market orders hitting the market maker's limit orders compared with the rate of price jumps, and the trading horizon is sufficiently long. In addition, our theoretical and numerical results suggest that latency can be an additional source of risk and latency impacts negatively the performance of market makers.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Latency and Liquidity Risk

    q-fin.TR 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A liquidity taker's latency-optimal discretion is characterized by δ*_t = 2γE_{t-}[D_T]+γ+α, the solution of a random-measure FBSDE, but the optimality proof and numerical regime contain gaps.

Pith tools