REVIEW 2 cited by
A Survey of Inverse Reinforcement Learning: Challenges, Methods and Progress
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) is the problem of inferring the reward function of an agent, given its policy or observed behavior. Analogous to RL, IRL is perceived both as a problem and as a class of methods. By categorically surveying the current literature in IRL, this article serves as a reference for researchers and practitioners of machine learning and beyond to understand the challenges of IRL and select the approaches best suited for the problem on hand. The survey formally introduces the IRL problem along with its central challenges such as the difficulty in performing accurate inference and its generalizability, its sensitivity to prior knowledge, and the disproportionate growth in solution complexity with problem size. The article elaborates how the current methods mitigate these challenges. We further discuss the extensions to traditional IRL methods for handling: inaccurate and incomplete perception, an incomplete model, multiple reward functions, and nonlinear reward functions. This survey concludes the discussion with some broad advances in the research area and currently open research questions.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Is Optimal Transport Necessary for Inverse Reinforcement Learning?
Simple nearest-neighbor and segment-matching reward functions match or beat Optimal Transport based Inverse RL across 32 benchmarks.
-
Generative AI for Autonomous Driving: A Review
A review of generative models (VAEs, GANs, diffusion, transformers, LLMs) applied to map generation, scenario generation, trajectory prediction, and motion planning for autonomous driving.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.