Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Where does Titan Sand Come From: Insight from Mechanical Properties of Titan Sand Candidates

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1806.08056 v1 pith:SNJPUQJV submitted 2018-06-21 astro-ph.EP

classification astro-ph.EP
keywords sandtitansmallertholinbrittlecandidatesduneselastic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Extensive equatorial linear dunes exist on Titan, but the origin of the sand, which appears to be organic, is unknown. We used nanoindentation to study the mechanical properties of a few Titan sand candidates, several natural sands on Earth, and common materials used in the Titan Wind Tunnel, to understand the mobility of Titan sand. We measured the elastic modulus (E), hardness (H), and fracture toughness (Kc) of these materials. Tholin's elastic modulus (10.4+/-0.5 GPa) and hardness (0.53+/-0.03 GPa) are both an order of magnitude smaller than silicate sand, and is also smaller than the mechanically weak white gypsum sand. With a magnitude smaller fracture toughness (Kc=0.036+/-0.007 MPa-m^(1/2)), tholin is also much more brittle than silicate sand. This indicates that Titan sand should be derived close to the equatorial regions where the current dunes are located, because tholin is too soft and brittle to be transported for long distances.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools