Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Deeply-Sparse Signal rePresentations ($\text{D}\text{S}^2\text{P}$)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1807.01958 v5 pith:CXGSFRR4 submitted 2018-07-05 eess.SP cs.LG

classification eess.SPcs.LG
keywords deepsparselearningalgorithmcomplexitynumbersequencetext
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

A recent line of work shows that a deep neural network with ReLU nonlinearities arises from a finite sequence of cascaded sparse coding models, the outputs of which, except for the last element in the cascade, are sparse and unobservable. That is, intermediate outputs deep in the cascade are sparse, hence the title of this manuscript. We show here, using techniques from the dictionary learning literature that, if the measurement matrices in the cascaded sparse coding model (a) satisfy RIP and (b) all have sparse columns except for the last, they can be recovered with high probability. We propose two algorithms for this purpose: one that recovers the matrices in a forward sequence, and another that recovers them in a backward sequence. The method of choice in deep learning to solve this problem is by training an auto-encoder. Our algorithms provide a sound alternative, with theoretical guarantees, as well upper bounds on sample complexity. The theory shows that the learning complexity of the forward algorithm depends on the number of hidden units at the deepest layer and the number of active neurons at that layer (sparsity). In addition, the theory relates the number of hidden units in successive layers, thus giving a practical prescription for designing deep ReLU neural networks. Because it puts fewer restrictions on the architecture, the backward algorithm requires more data. We demonstrate the deep dictionary learning algorithm via simulations. Finally, we use a coupon-collection argument to conjecture a lower bound on sample complexity that gives some insight as to why deep networks require more data to train than shallow ones.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. RandNet: deep learning with compressed measurements of images

    cs.LG 2019-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A sparse auto-encoder called RandNet learns image dictionaries and classifies MNIST from random compressed measurements, reaching 1.56% test error at 50% compression.

Pith tools