REVIEW 3 cited by
SmartSeed: Smart Seed Generation for Efficient Fuzzing
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Fuzzing is an automated application vulnerability detection method. For genetic algorithm-based fuzzing, it can mutate the seed files provided by users to obtain a number of inputs, which are then used to test the objective application in order to trigger potential crashes. As shown in existing literature, the seed file selection is crucial for the efficiency of fuzzing. However, current seed selection strategies do not seem to be better than randomly picking seed files. Therefore, in this paper, we propose a novel and generic system, named SmartSeed, to generate seed files towards efficient fuzzing. Specifically, SmartSeed is designed based on a machine learning model to learn and generate high-value binary seeds. We evaluate SmartSeed along with American Fuzzy Lop (AFL) on 12 open-source applications with the input formats of mp3, bmp or flv. We also combine SmartSeed with different fuzzing tools to examine its compatibility. From extensive experiments, we find that SmartSeed has the following advantages: First, it only requires tens of seconds to generate sufficient high-value seeds. Second, it can generate seeds with multiple kinds of input formats and significantly improves the fuzzing performance for most applications with the same input format. Third, SmartSeed is compatible to different fuzzing tools. In total, our system discovers more than twice unique crashes and 5,040 extra unique paths than the existing best seed selection strategy for the evaluated 12 applications. From the crashes found by SmartSeed, we discover 16 new vulnerabilities and have received their CVE IDs.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Reactive Bottom-Up Testing
Griller detects vulnerabilities by fuzzing functions in isolation and then filtering out crashes that are unreachable in the full program context.
-
Harnessing Large Language Models for Seed Generation in Greybox Fuzzing
SeedMind generates fuzzing seeds by having an LLM write a seed generator and iteratively refine it using code coverage feedback.
-
A systematic review of fuzzing based on machine learning techniques
A review of 29 machine learning based fuzzing studies that organizes the field into six pipeline stages, but its favorable conclusion relies on best-case metric selection and inconsistent benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.