RECORD
Hyperbolicity and uniformity of varieties of log general type
Algebraic Geometry · Submitted 16 Jul 2018
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim We show that all subvarieties of a quasi-projective variety with almost ample log cotangent bundle are of log general type.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
Projective varieties with ample cotangent bundle satisfy many notions of hyperbolicity, and one goal of this paper is to discuss generalizations to quasi-projective varieties. A major hurdle is that the naive generalization fails, i.e. the log cotangent bundle is never ample. Instead, we define a notion called almost ample which roughly asks that the log cotangent is as positive as possible. We show that all subvarieties of a quasi-projective variety with almost ample log cotangent bundle are of log general type. In addition, if one assumes globally generated then we obtain that such varieties contain finitely many integral points. In another direction, we show that the Lang-Vojta conjecture implies the number of stably integral points on curves of log general type, and surfaces of log general type with almost ample log cotangent sheaf are uniformly bounded.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | Projective varieties with ample cotangent bundle satisfy many notions of hyperbolicity, and one goal of this paper is to discuss generalizations to quasi-projective varieties. | background 0.97 | 0.13 | 0.04 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | A major hurdle is that the naive generalization fails, i.e. the log cotangent bundle is never ample. | background 0.49 | 0.24 | 0.03 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | Instead, we define a notion called almost ample which roughly asks that the log cotangent is as positive as possible. | contribution 0.81 | 0.90 | 0.06 | asserted 0.92 |
| s3 | We show that all subvarieties of a quasi-projective variety with almost ample log cotangent bundle are of log general type. | result 0.99 | 0.94 | 0.33 | asserted 1.00 |
| s4 | In addition, if one assumes globally generated then we obtain that such varieties contain finitely many integral points. | result 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.10 | asserted 0.99 |
| s5 | In another direction, we show that the Lang-Vojta conjecture implies the number of stably integral points on curves of log general type, and surfaces of log general type with almost ample log cotangent sheaf are uniformly bounded. | result 0.92 | 0.79 | 0.24 | asserted 0.98 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v5
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
Projective varieties with ample cotangent bundle satisfy many notions of hyperbolicity, and one goal of this paper is to discuss generalizations to quasi-projective varieties. A major hurdle is that the naive generalization fails, i.e. the log cotangent bundle is never ample. Instead, we define a notion called almost ample which roughly asks that the log cotangent is as positive as possible. We show that all subvarieties of a quasi-projective variety with almost ample log cotangent bundle are of log general type. In addition, if one assumes globally generated then we obtain that such varieties contain finitely many integral points. In another direction, we show that the Lang-Vojta conjecture implies the number of stably integral points on curves of log general type, and surfaces of log general type with almost ample log cotangent sheaf are uniformly bounded.
Human review
How the literature uses it
1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.