Pith. Sign in

RECORD

On a complexification of the moduli space of Bohr - Sommerfeld lagrangian cycles

Symplectic Geometry · Submitted 30 Jul 2018

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim This implies that an appropriate section of the first map should define a complex structure on $T {\cal B}_S$; therefore it can be seen as a complexification of the moduli space ${\cal B}_S$.

how it is stated · asserted 0.52 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1807.11351 (version 1)
Pith ID42RBMO5V, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationNikolai A. Tyurin. "On a complexification of the moduli space of Bohr - Sommerfeld lagrangian cycles." arXiv:1807.11351 (2018). https://pith.science/paper/42RBMO5V
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,071 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.07 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.03 · compares with prior results 0.43 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

In the previous papers we present a construction of the set ${\cal U}_{SBS}$ in the direct product ${\cal B}_S \times \mathbb{P} \Gamma (M, L)$ of the moduli space of Bohr - Sommerfeld lagrangian submanifolds of fixed topological type and the projectivized space of smooth sections of the prequantization bundle $L \to M$ over a given compact simply connected symplectic manifold $M$. Canonical projections $p: {\cal U}_{SBS} \to \mathbb{P} \Gamma (M, L)$ and $q: {\cal U}_{SBS} \to {\cal B}_S$ are studied in the present text: first, we show that the differential ${\rm d} p$ at a given point is an isomorphism, which implies that a natural complex structure can be defined on ${\cal U}_{SBS}$; second, the projection $q: {\cal U}_{SBS} \to {\cal B}_S$ splits as the combination ${\cal U}_{SBS} \to T {\cal B}_S \to {\cal B}_S$ such that the fibers of the first map are complex subsets in ${\cal U}_{SBS}$. This implies that an appropriate section of the first map should define a complex structure on $T {\cal B}_S$; therefore it can be seen as a complexification of the moduli space ${\cal B}_S$. The construction can be exploited in the Lagrangian approach to Geometric Quantization

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 In the previous papers we present a construction of the set ${\cal U}_{SBS}$ in the direct product ${\cal B}_S \times \mathbb{P} \Gamma (M, L)$ of the moduli space of Bohr - Sommerfeld lagrangian submanifolds of fixed topological type and the projectivized space of smooth sections of the prequantization bundle $L \to M$ over a given compact simply connected symplectic manifold $M$. background 0.95 0.42 0.06 asserted 1.00
s1 Canonical projections $p: {\cal U}_{SBS} \to \mathbb{P} \Gamma (M, L)$ and $q: {\cal U}_{SBS} \to {\cal B}_S$ are studied in the present text: first, we show that the differential ${\rm d} p$ at a given point is an isomorphism, which implies that a natural complex structure can be defined on ${\cal U}_{SBS}$; second, the projection $q: {\cal U}_{SBS} \to {\cal B}_S$ splits as the combination ${\cal U}_{SBS} \to T {\cal B}_S \to {\cal B}_S$ such that the fibers of the first map are complex subsets in ${\cal U}_{SBS}$. result 0.62 0.93 0.29 asserted 1.00
s2 This implies that an appropriate section of the first map should define a complex structure on $T {\cal B}_S$; therefore it can be seen as a complexification of the moduli space ${\cal B}_S$. interpretation 0.99 0.79 0.72 asserted 0.52
s3 The construction can be exploited in the Lagrangian approach to Geometric Quantization interpretation 0.72 0.31 0.10 hedged possibility 0.88

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.98 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

In the previous papers we present a construction of the set ${\cal U}_{SBS}$ in the direct product ${\cal B}_S \times \mathbb{P} \Gamma (M, L)$ of the moduli space of Bohr - Sommerfeld lagrangian submanifolds of fixed topological type and the projectivized space of smooth sections of the prequantization bundle $L \to M$ over a given compact simply connected symplectic manifold $M$. Canonical projections $p: {\cal U}_{SBS} \to \mathbb{P} \Gamma (M, L)$ and $q: {\cal U}_{SBS} \to {\cal B}_S$ are studied in the present text: first, we show that the differential ${\rm d} p$ at a given point is an isomorphism, which implies that a natural complex structure can be defined on ${\cal U}_{SBS}$; second, the projection $q: {\cal U}_{SBS} \to {\cal B}_S$ splits as the combination ${\cal U}_{SBS} \to T {\cal B}_S \to {\cal B}_S$ such that the fibers of the first map are complex subsets in ${\cal U}_{SBS}$. This implies that an appropriate section of the first map should define a complex structure on $T {\cal B}_S$; therefore it can be seen as a complexification of the moduli space ${\cal B}_S$. The construction can be exploited in the Lagrangian approach to Geometric Quantization

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.