Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Generalized budgeted submodular set function maximization

Data Structures and Algorithms · Submitted 9 Aug 2018

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim If we set $\beta=\frac{1}{\alpha}\ln \left(\frac{1}{2\epsilon}\right)$, the algorithm achieves an approximation factor of $\frac{1}{2}-\epsilon$, for any arbitrarily small $\epsilon>0$.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1808.03085 (version 1)
Pith IDSQSUK76O, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationFrancesco Cellinese, Gianlorenzo D'Angelo, Gianpiero Monaco, Yllka Velaj. "Generalized budgeted submodular set function maximization." arXiv:1808.03085 (2018). https://pith.science/paper/SQSUK76O
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 9,030 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.07 · states limitation 0.88 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.02 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.76 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

In this paper we consider a generalization of the well-known budgeted maximum coverage problem. We are given a ground set of elements and a set of bins. The goal is to find a subset of elements along with an associated set of bins, such that the overall cost is at most a given budget, and the profit is maximized. Each bin has its own cost and the cost of each element depends on its associated bin. The profit is measured by a monotone submodular function over the elements. We first present an algorithm that guarantees an approximation factor of $\frac{1}{2}\left(1-\frac{1}{e^\alpha}\right)$, where $\alpha \leq 1$ is the approximation factor of an algorithm for a sub-problem. We give two polynomial-time algorithms to solve this sub-problem. The first one gives us $\alpha=1- \epsilon$ if the costs satisfies a specific condition, which is fulfilled in several relevant cases, including the unitary costs case and the problem of maximizing a monotone submodular function under a knapsack constraint. The second one guarantees $\alpha=1-\frac{1}{e}-\epsilon$ for the general case. The gap between our approximation guarantees and the known inapproximability bounds is $\frac{1}{2}$. We extend our algorithm to a bi-criterion approximation algorithm in which we are allowed to spend an extra budget up to a factor $\beta\geq 1$ to guarantee a $\frac{1}{2}\left(1-\frac{1}{e^{\alpha\beta}}\right)$-approximation. If we set $\beta=\frac{1}{\alpha}\ln \left(\frac{1}{2\epsilon}\right)$, the algorithm achieves an approximation factor of $\frac{1}{2}-\epsilon$, for any arbitrarily small $\epsilon>0$.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 In this paper we consider a generalization of the well-known budgeted maximum coverage problem. background 0.75 0.57 0.04 asserted 0.93
s1 We are given a ground set of elements and a set of bins. background 0.87 0.19 0.01 asserted 0.97
s2 The goal is to find a subset of elements along with an associated set of bins, such that the overall cost is at most a given budget, and the profit is maximized. background 0.75 0.29 0.06 asserted 0.99
s3 Each bin has its own cost and the cost of each element depends on its associated bin. background 0.95 0.22 0.02 asserted 1.00
s4 The profit is measured by a monotone submodular function over the elements. background 0.90 0.22 0.03 asserted 1.00
s5 We first present an algorithm that guarantees an approximation factor of $\frac{1}{2}\left(1-\frac{1}{e^\alpha}\right)$, where $\alpha \leq 1$ is the approximation factor of an algorithm for a sub-problem. result 0.62 0.94 0.47 asserted 1.00
s6 We give two polynomial-time algorithms to solve this sub-problem. contribution 0.53 0.95 0.04 asserted 1.00
s7 The first one gives us $\alpha=1- \epsilon$ if the costs satisfies a specific condition, which is fulfilled in several relevant cases, including the unitary costs case and the problem of maximizing a monotone submodular function under a knapsack constraint. result 0.80 0.89 0.07 asserted 1.00
s8 The second one guarantees $\alpha=1-\frac{1}{e}-\epsilon$ for the general case. result 0.79 0.96 0.10 asserted 1.00
s9 The gap between our approximation guarantees and the known inapproximability bounds is $\frac{1}{2}$. result 0.35 0.69 0.13 asserted 1.00
s10 We extend our algorithm to a bi-criterion approximation algorithm in which we are allowed to spend an extra budget up to a factor $\beta\geq 1$ to guarantee a $\frac{1}{2}\left(1-\frac{1}{e^{\alpha\beta}}\right)$-approximation. contribution 0.91 0.95 0.13 asserted 1.00
s11 If we set $\beta=\frac{1}{\alpha}\ln \left(\frac{1}{2\epsilon}\right)$, the algorithm achieves an approximation factor of $\frac{1}{2}-\epsilon$, for any arbitrarily small $\epsilon>0$. result 0.95 0.93 0.25 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.75 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

In this paper we consider a generalization of the well-known budgeted maximum coverage problem. We are given a ground set of elements and a set of bins. The goal is to find a subset of elements along with an associated set of bins, such that the overall cost is at most a given budget, and the profit is maximized. Each bin has its own cost and the cost of each element depends on its associated bin. The profit is measured by a monotone submodular function over the elements. We first present an algorithm that guarantees an approximation factor of $\frac{1}{2}\left(1-\frac{1}{e^\alpha}\right)$, where $\alpha \leq 1$ is the approximation factor of an algorithm for a sub-problem. We give two polynomial-time algorithms to solve this sub-problem. The first one gives us $\alpha=1- \epsilon$ if the costs satisfies a specific condition, which is fulfilled in several relevant cases, including the unitary costs case and the problem of maximizing a monotone submodular function under a knapsack constraint. The second one guarantees $\alpha=1-\frac{1}{e}-\epsilon$ for the general case. The gap between our approximation guarantees and the known inapproximability bounds is $\frac{1}{2}$. We extend our algorithm to a bi-criterion approximation algorithm in which we are allowed to spend an extra budget up to a factor $\beta\geq 1$ to guarantee a $\frac{1}{2}\left(1-\frac{1}{e^{\alpha\beta}}\right)$-approximation. If we set $\beta=\frac{1}{\alpha}\ln \left(\frac{1}{2\epsilon}\right)$, the algorithm achieves an approximation factor of $\frac{1}{2}-\epsilon$, for any arbitrarily small $\epsilon>0$.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.