REVIEW
Neural Networks Assist Crowd Predictions in Discerning the Veracity of Emotional Expressions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Neural Networks Assist Crowd Predictions in Discerning the Veracity of Emotional Expressions
read the original abstract
Crowd predictions have demonstrated powerful performance in predicting future events. We aim to understand crowd prediction efficacy in ascertaining the veracity of human emotional expressions. We discover that collective discernment can increase the accuracy of detecting emotion veracity from 63%, which is the average individual performance, to 80%. Constraining data to best performers can further increase the result up to 92%. Neural networks can achieve an accuracy to 99.69% by aggregating participants' answers. That is, assigning positive and negative weights to high and low human predictors, respectively. Furthermore, neural networks that are trained with one emotion data can also produce high accuracies on discerning the veracity of other emotion types: our crowdsourced transfer of emotion learning is novel. We find that our neural networks do not require a large number of participants, particularly, 30 randomly selected, to achieve high accuracy predictions, better than any individual participant. Our proposed method of assembling peoples' predictions with neural networks can provide insights for applications such as fake news prevention and lie detection.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.