Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Neural Networks Assist Crowd Predictions in Discerning the Veracity of Emotional Expressions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1808.05359 v1 pith:KFBVRAB2 submitted 2018-08-16 cs.HC

Neural Networks Assist Crowd Predictions in Discerning the Veracity of Emotional Expressions

classification cs.HC
keywords networksneuralemotionpredictionsveracityaccuracycrowdhigh
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Crowd predictions have demonstrated powerful performance in predicting future events. We aim to understand crowd prediction efficacy in ascertaining the veracity of human emotional expressions. We discover that collective discernment can increase the accuracy of detecting emotion veracity from 63%, which is the average individual performance, to 80%. Constraining data to best performers can further increase the result up to 92%. Neural networks can achieve an accuracy to 99.69% by aggregating participants' answers. That is, assigning positive and negative weights to high and low human predictors, respectively. Furthermore, neural networks that are trained with one emotion data can also produce high accuracies on discerning the veracity of other emotion types: our crowdsourced transfer of emotion learning is novel. We find that our neural networks do not require a large number of participants, particularly, 30 randomly selected, to achieve high accuracy predictions, better than any individual participant. Our proposed method of assembling peoples' predictions with neural networks can provide insights for applications such as fake news prevention and lie detection.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.