Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Bayesian Regression for a Dirichlet Distributed Response using Stan

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1808.06399 v1 pith:X2GZ3UCQ submitted 2018-08-20 stat.ME

Bayesian Regression for a Dirichlet Distributed Response using Stan

classification stat.ME
keywords responsebayesiancompositionscovariatesdirichletdistributedproportionsregression
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

For an observed response that is composed by a set - or vector - of positive values that sum up to 1, the Dirichlet distribution (Bol'shev, 2018) is a helpful mathematical construction for the quantification of the data-generating mechanics underlying this process. In applications, these response-sets are usually denoted as proportions, or compositions of proportions, and by means of covariates, one wishes to manifest the underlying signal - by changes in the value of these covariates - leading to differently distributed response compositions. This article gives a brief introduction into this class of regression models, and based on a recently developed formulation (Maier, 2014), illustrates the implementation in the Bayesian inference framework Stan.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Comparative study of Bayesian and Frequentist methods for epidemic forecasting: Insights from simulated and historical data

    q-bio.QM 2025-09 reject novelty 4.0

    Neither Bayesian nor frequentist fitting is uniformly better for epidemic forecasts; performance depends on phase and data, though the paper's own results undercut its phase-specific claims.