Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Quadratic Discriminant Analysis under Moderate Dimension

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1808.10065 v1 pith:S4DV4PKQ submitted 2018-08-29 math.ST stat.TH

classification math.STstat.TH
keywords dimensionanalysiscaseconvergesdiscriminantgeneralizedmoderateperform
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) is a simple method to classify a subject into two populations, and was proven to perform as well as the Bayes rule when the data dimension p is fixed. The main purpose of this paper is to examine the empirical and theoretical behaviors of QDA where p grows proportionally to the sample sizes without imposing any structural assumption on the parameters. The first finding in this moderate dimension regime is that QDA can perform as poorly as random guessing even when the two populations deviate significantly. This motivates a generalized version of QDA that automatically adapts to dimensionality. Under a finite fourth moment condition, we derive misclassification rates for both the generalized QDA and the optimal one. A direct comparison reveals one "easy" case where the difference between two rates converges to zero and one "hard" case where that converges to some strictly positive constant. For the latter, a divide-and-conquer approach over dimension (rather than sample) followed by a screening procedure is proposed to narrow the gap. Various numerical studies are conducted to back up the proposed methodology.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools