REVIEW 1 cited by
Do Language Models Understand Anything? On the Ability of LSTMs to Understand Negative Polarity Items
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In this paper, we attempt to link the inner workings of a neural language model to linguistic theory, focusing on a complex phenomenon well discussed in formal linguis- tics: (negative) polarity items. We briefly discuss the leading hypotheses about the licensing contexts that allow negative polarity items and evaluate to what extent a neural language model has the ability to correctly process a subset of such constructions. We show that the model finds a relation between the licensing context and the negative polarity item and appears to be aware of the scope of this context, which we extract from a parse tree of the sentence. With this research, we hope to pave the way for other studies linking formal linguistics to deep learning.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Investigating BERT's Knowledge of Language: Five Analysis Methods with NPIs
BERT's apparent knowledge of English NPI licensing varies across five evaluation methods, from near-perfect on gradient minimal pairs to inconsistent on absolute judgments and scope probing.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.