Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Dynamic Resource Allocation in the Cloud with Near-Optimal Efficiency

Data Structures and Algorithms · Submitted 7 Sep 2018

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Our main result is a simple and practical algorithm that achieves near-optimal performance on the above two objectives.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1809.02688 (version 3)
Pith ID7Z3D3UEP, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAlejandro Toriello, Ishai Menache, Mohit Singh, Sebastian Perez-Salazar. "Dynamic Resource Allocation in the Cloud with Near-Optimal Efficiency." arXiv:1809.02688 (2018). https://pith.science/paper/7Z3D3UEP
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 8,737 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.61 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.28 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.15 · compares with prior results 0.52 · mentions code or data availability 0.04.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Cloud computing has motivated renewed interest in resource allocation problems with new consumption models. A common goal is to share a resource, such as CPU or I/O bandwidth, among distinct users with different demand patterns as well as different quality of service requirements. To ensure these service requirements, cloud offerings often come with a service level agreement (SLA) between the provider and the users. An SLA specifies the amount of a resource a user is entitled to utilize. In many cloud settings, providers would like to operate resources at high utilization while simultaneously respecting individual SLAs. There is typically a tradeoff between these two objectives; for example, utilization can be increased by shifting away resources from idle users to "scavenger" workload, but with the risk of the former then becoming active again. We study this fundamental tradeoff by formulating a resource allocation model that captures basic properties of cloud computing systems, including SLAs, highly limited feedback about the state of the system, and variable and unpredictable input sequences. Our main result is a simple and practical algorithm that achieves near-optimal performance on the above two objectives. First, we guarantee nearly optimal utilization of the resource even if compared to the omniscient offline dynamic optimum. Second, we simultaneously satisfy all individual SLAs up to a small error. The main algorithmic tool is a multiplicative weight update algorithm, and a primal-dual argument to obtain its guarantees. We also provide numerical validation on real data to demonstrate the performance of our algorithm in practical applications.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Cloud computing has motivated renewed interest in resource allocation problems with new consumption models. background 1.00 0.04 0.01 asserted 1.00
s1 A common goal is to share a resource, such as CPU or I/O bandwidth, among distinct users with different demand patterns as well as different quality of service requirements. background 1.00 0.04 0.01 asserted 0.93
s2 To ensure these service requirements, cloud offerings often come with a service level agreement (SLA) between the provider and the users. background 1.00 0.04 0.01 asserted 0.90
s3 An SLA specifies the amount of a resource a user is entitled to utilize. background 1.00 0.04 0.01 asserted 1.00
s4 In many cloud settings, providers would like to operate resources at high utilization while simultaneously respecting individual SLAs. background 1.00 0.07 0.02 hedged possibility 0.64
s5 There is typically a tradeoff between these two objectives; for example, utilization can be increased by shifting away resources from idle users to "scavenger" workload, but with the risk of the former then becoming active again. background 0.99 0.07 0.02 asserted 0.79
s6 We study this fundamental tradeoff by formulating a resource allocation model that captures basic properties of cloud computing systems, including SLAs, highly limited feedback about the state of the system, and variable and unpredictable input sequences. contribution 0.67 0.92 0.04 asserted 0.98
s7 Our main result is a simple and practical algorithm that achieves near-optimal performance on the above two objectives. contribution 0.75 0.96 0.94 asserted 1.00
s8 First, we guarantee nearly optimal utilization of the resource even if compared to the omniscient offline dynamic optimum. result 0.96 0.94 0.32 asserted 1.00
s9 Second, we simultaneously satisfy all individual SLAs up to a small error. result 0.96 0.95 0.25 asserted 1.00
s10 The main algorithmic tool is a multiplicative weight update algorithm, and a primal-dual argument to obtain its guarantees. method 0.99 0.89 0.04 asserted 0.99
s11 We also provide numerical validation on real data to demonstrate the performance of our algorithm in practical applications. contribution 0.61 0.95 0.03 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.94 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.95.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Cloud computing has motivated renewed interest in resource allocation problems with new consumption models. A common goal is to share a resource, such as CPU or I/O bandwidth, among distinct users with different demand patterns as well as different quality of service requirements. To ensure these service requirements, cloud offerings often come with a service level agreement (SLA) between the provider and the users. An SLA specifies the amount of a resource a user is entitled to utilize. In many cloud settings, providers would like to operate resources at high utilization while simultaneously respecting individual SLAs. There is typically a tradeoff between these two objectives; for example, utilization can be increased by shifting away resources from idle users to "scavenger" workload, but with the risk of the former then becoming active again. We study this fundamental tradeoff by formulating a resource allocation model that captures basic properties of cloud computing systems, including SLAs, highly limited feedback about the state of the system, and variable and unpredictable input sequences. Our main result is a simple and practical algorithm that achieves near-optimal performance on the above two objectives. First, we guarantee nearly optimal utilization of the resource even if compared to the omniscient offline dynamic optimum. Second, we simultaneously satisfy all individual SLAs up to a small error. The main algorithmic tool is a multiplicative weight update algorithm, and a primal-dual argument to obtain its guarantees. We also provide numerical validation on real data to demonstrate the performance of our algorithm in practical applications.

Human review
How the literature uses it

3 arXiv papers cite this in 3 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 2 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.