REVIEW 2 cited by
Multilingual Extractive Reading Comprehension by Runtime Machine Translation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Despite recent work in Reading Comprehension (RC), progress has been mostly limited to English due to the lack of large-scale datasets in other languages. In this work, we introduce the first RC system for languages without RC training data. Given a target language without RC training data and a pivot language with RC training data (e.g. English), our method leverages existing RC resources in the pivot language by combining a competitive RC model in the pivot language with an attentive Neural Machine Translation (NMT) model. We first translate the data from the target to the pivot language, and then obtain an answer using the RC model in the pivot language. Finally, we recover the corresponding answer in the original language using soft-alignment attention scores from the NMT model. We create evaluation sets of RC data in two non-English languages, namely Japanese and French, to evaluate our method. Experimental results on these datasets show that our method significantly outperforms a back-translation baseline of a state-of-the-art product-level machine translation system.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Cross-Lingual Machine Reading Comprehension
Dual BERT, a multilingual BERT model with a bilingual decoder, improves machine reading comprehension in low-resource languages by jointly modeling machine-translated source data and target data.
-
Beyond English-Only Reading Comprehension: Experiments in Zero-Shot Multilingual Transfer for Bulgarian
Multilingual BERT fine-tuned on English RACE answers Bulgarian multiple-choice questions at 42.23% accuracy using Wikipedia retrieval, on a new 2,633-question benchmark, well above the 24.89% random baseline.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.