Hate Speech Dataset from a White Supremacy Forum
read the original abstract
Hate speech is commonly defined as any communication that disparages a target group of people based on some characteristic such as race, colour, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, nationality, religion, or other characteristic. Due to the massive rise of user-generated web content on social media, the amount of hate speech is also steadily increasing. Over the past years, interest in online hate speech detection and, particularly, the automation of this task has continuously grown, along with the societal impact of the phenomenon. This paper describes a hate speech dataset composed of thousands of sentences manually labelled as containing hate speech or not. The sentences have been extracted from Stormfront, a white supremacist forum. A custom annotation tool has been developed to carry out the manual labelling task which, among other things, allows the annotators to choose whether to read the context of a sentence before labelling it. The paper also provides a thoughtful qualitative and quantitative study of the resulting dataset and several baseline experiments with different classification models. The dataset is publicly available.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Distributional Alignment as a Criterion for Designing Task Vectors in In-Context Learning
A distributional alignment metric d_NTP and a linear regression method LTV for task vectors that improves accuracy by 9.2% over baselines on classification and regression tasks across multiple LLMs.
-
DeconDTN-Toolkit: A Library for Evaluation and Enhancement of Robustness to Provenance Shift
DeconDTN-Toolkit simulates provenance shifts to expose ERM vulnerabilities and provides tools plus a robust OOD indicator for mitigating confounding by data provenance.
-
LIMO: Less is More for Reasoning
LIMO achieves 63.3% on AIME24 and 95.6% on MATH500 via supervised fine-tuning on roughly 1% of the data used by prior models, supporting the claim that minimal strategic examples suffice when pre-training has already ...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.