Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Branching random walk in random environment with random absorption wall

Probability · Submitted 13 Sep 2018

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We show that there exists a critical value $a_c>0$ such that if $a>a_c,\alpha=\frac{1}{3}$, the survival probability is positive almost surly and if $a<a_c,\alpha=\frac{1}{3}$ ,the survival probability is zero almost surely.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1809.04969 (version 2)
Pith IDSNVGZP6G, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationYou Lv. "Branching random walk in random environment with random absorption wall." arXiv:1809.04969 (2018). https://pith.science/paper/SNVGZP6G
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,130 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.33 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.13 · randomized assignment 0.02 · states quantitative result 0.89 · compares with prior results 0.07 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We consider the branching random walk in random environment with a random absorption wall. When we add this barrier, we discuss some topics related to the survival probability. We assume that the random environment is i.i.d., $S_i$ is a particular i.i.d. random walk depend on the random environment $\mathcal{L}$. Let the random barrier function (the random absorption wall) is $g_i(\mathcal{L}):=ai^\alpha-S_i,$ where $i$ present the generation. We show that there exists a critical value $a_c>0$ such that if $a>a_c,\alpha=\frac{1}{3}$, the survival probability is positive almost surly and if $a<a_c,\alpha=\frac{1}{3}$ ,the survival probability is zero almost surely. Moreover, if we denote $Z_n$ is the total populations in $n$-th generation in the new system (with barrier),under some conditions, we show $\ln\mathbb{P}_{\mathcal{L}}(Z_n>0)/n^{1/3}$ will converges to a negative constant almost surely if $\alpha\in[0,\frac{1}{3})$.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We consider the branching random walk in random environment with a random absorption wall. contribution 0.58 0.44 0.03 asserted 0.62
s1 When we add this barrier, we discuss some topics related to the survival probability. contribution 0.85 0.67 0.03 unclear 0.49
s2 We assume that the random environment is i.i.d., $S_i$ is a particular i.i.d. random walk depend on the random environment $\mathcal{L}$. method 0.82 0.28 0.02 asserted 0.98
s3 Let the random barrier function (the random absorption wall) is $g_i(\mathcal{L}):=ai^\alpha-S_i,$ where $i$ present the generation. method 0.93 0.42 0.03 asserted 0.97
s4 We show that there exists a critical value $a_c>0$ such that if $a>a_c,\alpha=\frac{1}{3}$, the survival probability is positive almost surly and if $a<a_c,\alpha=\frac{1}{3}$ ,the survival probability is zero almost surely. result 1.00 0.94 0.76 asserted 1.00
s5 Moreover, if we denote $Z_n$ is the total populations in $n$-th generation in the new system (with barrier),under some conditions, we show $\ln\mathbb{P}_{\mathcal{L}}(Z_n>0)/n^{1/3}$ will converges to a negative constant almost surely if $\alpha\in[0,\frac{1}{3})$. result 1.00 0.94 0.19 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We consider the branching random walk in random environment with a random absorption wall. When we add this barrier, we discuss some topics related to the survival probability. We assume that the random environment is i.i.d., $S_i$ is a particular i.i.d. random walk depend on the random environment $\mathcal{L}$. Let the random barrier function (the random absorption wall) is $g_i(\mathcal{L}):=ai^\alpha-S_i,$ where $i$ present the generation. We show that there exists a critical value $a_c>0$ such that if $a>a_c,\alpha=\frac{1}{3}$, the survival probability is positive almost surly and if $a<a_c,\alpha=\frac{1}{3}$ ,the survival probability is zero almost surely. Moreover, if we denote $Z_n$ is the total populations in $n$-th generation in the new system (with barrier),under some conditions, we show $\ln\mathbb{P}_{\mathcal{L}}(Z_n>0)/n^{1/3}$ will converges to a negative constant almost surely if $\alpha\in[0,\frac{1}{3})$.

Human review
How the literature uses it

2 arXiv papers cite this in 2 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 5 sentences without a confident label

Cites as background 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.