Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Open Subtitles Paraphrase Corpus for Six Languages

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1809.06142 v1 pith:MY4HGUV4 submitted 2018-09-17 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords beencorpuslanguagepairssetsdataparaphrasessentence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper accompanies the release of Opusparcus, a new paraphrase corpus for six European languages: German, English, Finnish, French, Russian, and Swedish. The corpus consists of paraphrases, that is, pairs of sentences in the same language that mean approximately the same thing. The paraphrases are extracted from the OpenSubtitles2016 corpus, which contains subtitles from movies and TV shows. The informal and colloquial genre that occurs in subtitles makes such data a very interesting language resource, for instance, from the perspective of computer assisted language learning. For each target language, the Opusparcus data have been partitioned into three types of data sets: training, development and test sets. The training sets are large, consisting of millions of sentence pairs, and have been compiled automatically, with the help of probabilistic ranking functions. The development and test sets consist of sentence pairs that have been checked manually; each set contains approximately 1000 sentence pairs that have been verified to be acceptable paraphrases by two annotators.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. When Babies Teach Babies: Can student knowledge sharing outperform Teacher-Guided Distillation on small datasets?

    cs.CL 2024-11 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    On BabyLM 10M/100M data, teacher-less mutual learning with learned student weights improves over RoBERTa-base by 1-3% on BLiMP, yet simple self-distillation outperforms the proposed DWML.

Pith tools