Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Perfect Match: A Simple Method for Learning Representations For Counterfactual Inference With Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1810.00656 v5 pith:EZPCN3YM submitted 2018-10-01 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords counterfactualinferencenetworksneuraltreatmentscomplexdatalearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Learning representations for counterfactual inference from observational data is of high practical relevance for many domains, such as healthcare, public policy and economics. Counterfactual inference enables one to answer "What if...?" questions, such as "What would be the outcome if we gave this patient treatment $t_1$?". However, current methods for training neural networks for counterfactual inference on observational data are either overly complex, limited to settings with only two available treatments, or both. Here, we present Perfect Match (PM), a method for training neural networks for counterfactual inference that is easy to implement, compatible with any architecture, does not add computational complexity or hyperparameters, and extends to any number of treatments. PM is based on the idea of augmenting samples within a minibatch with their propensity-matched nearest neighbours. Our experiments demonstrate that PM outperforms a number of more complex state-of-the-art methods in inferring counterfactual outcomes across several benchmarks, particularly in settings with many treatments.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Do Fair Models Reason Fairly? Counterfactual Explanation Consistency for Procedural Fairness in Credit Decisions

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Outcome-fair credit models often exhibit hidden procedural bias through inconsistent reasoning across groups, which the CEC framework mitigates by enforcing consistent feature attributions via counterfactuals.

  2. CanniUplift: A Holistic Framework for Mitigating Seller and Incentive Cannibalization in E-commerce Uplift Modeling

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CanniUplift mitigates cross-seller substitution and non-redemption noise in e-commerce uplift modeling via a global GMV alignment loss and a redemption-based outcome decomposition, improving platform-wide incremental GMV.

  3. Leveraging a Simulator for Learning Causal Representations from Post-Treatment Covariates for CATE

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SimPONet jointly trains on real observational data and simulator counterfactuals to estimate CATE from post-treatment covariates, guided by a new generalization bound.

  4. Orthogonal Representation Learning for Estimating Causal Quantities

    cs.LG 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Introduces OR-learners that can strictly improve estimation error of standard Neyman-orthogonal learners under the low-dimensional manifold hypothesis, while showing that balancing constraints require additional induc...

Pith tools