Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Bayesian inference in high-dimensional linear models using an empirical correlation-adaptive prior

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1810.00739 v1 pith:4V5C65TT submitted 2018-10-01 stat.ME math.STstat.TH

classification stat.MEmath.STstat.TH
keywords empiricalcorrelation-adaptivehigh-dimensionallinearpriorvariableacrossadaptively
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In the context of a high-dimensional linear regression model, we propose the use of an empirical correlation-adaptive prior that makes use of information in the observed predictor variable matrix to adaptively address high collinearity, determining if parameters associated with correlated predictors should be shrunk together or kept apart. Under suitable conditions, we prove that this empirical Bayes posterior concentrates around the true sparse parameter at the optimal rate asymptotically. A simplified version of a shotgun stochastic search algorithm is employed to implement the variable selection procedure, and we show, via simulation experiments across different settings and a real-data application, the favorable performance of the proposed method compared to existing methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. IndianBailJudgments-1200: A Multi-Attribute Dataset for Legal NLP on Indian Bail Orders

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    IndianBailJudgments-1200 is the first public multi-attribute dataset focused on Indian bail jurisprudence, built by LLM annotation of 1,200 High Court orders.

Pith tools