Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Joint Analysis of Galaxy Clustering, Galaxy Lensing, and CMB Lensing Two-point Functions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1810.02322 v1 pith:AYLZWOI6 submitted 2018-10-04 astro-ph.CO

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Joint Analysis of Galaxy Clustering, Galaxy Lensing, and CMB Lensing Two-point Functions

T. M. C. Abbott , F. B. Abdalla , A. Alarcon , S. Allam , J. Annis , S. Avila , K. Aylor , M. Banerji
show 160 more authors
N. Banik E. J. Baxter K. Bechtol M. R. Becker B. A. Benson G. M. Bernstein E. Bertin F. Bianchini J. Blazek L. Bleem L. E. Bleem S. L. Bridle D. Brooks E. Buckley-Geer D. L. Burke J. E. Carlstrom A. Carnero Rosell M. Carrasco Kind J. Carretero F. J. Castander R. Cawthon C. Chang C. L. Chang H-M. Cho A. Choi R. Chown T. M. Crawford A. T. Crites M. Crocce C. E. Cunha C. B. D'Andrea L. N. da Costa C. Davis T. de Haan J. DeRose S. Desai J. De Vicente H. T. Diehl J. P. Dietrich M. A. Dobbs S. Dodelson P. Doel A. Drlica-Wagner T. F. Eifler J. Elvin-Poole W. B. Everett B. Flaugher P. Fosalba O. Friedrich J. Frieman J. Garc\'ia-Bellido M. Gatti E. Gaztanaga E. M. George D. W. Gerdes T. Giannantonio D. Gruen R. A. Gruendl J. Gschwend G. Gutierrez N. W. Halverson N. L. Harrington W. G. Hartley G. P. Holder D. L. Hollowood W. L. Holzapfel K. Honscheid Z. Hou B. Hoyle J. D. Hrubes D. Huterer B. Jain D. J. James M. Jarvis T. Jeltema M. W. G. Johnson M. D. Johnson S. Kent D. Kirk L. Knox N. Kokron E. Krause K. Kuehn O. Lahav A. T. Lee E. M. Leitch T. S. Li M. Lima H. Lin D. Luong-Van N. MacCrann M. A. G. Maia A. Manzotti D. P. Marrone J. L. Marshall P. Martini J. J. McMahon F. Menanteau S. S. Meyer R. Miquel L. M. Mocanu J. J. Mohr J. Muir T. Natoli A. Nicola B. Nord Y. Omori S. Padin S. Pandey A. A. Plazas A. Porredon J. Prat C. Pryke M. M. Rau C. L. Reichardt R. P. Rollins A. K. Romer A. Roodman A. J. Ross E. Rozo J. E. Ruhl E. S. Rykoff S. Samuroff C. S\'anchez E. Sanchez J. T. Sayre V. Scarpine K. K. Schaffer L. F. Secco S. Serrano I. Sevilla-Noarbe E. Sheldon E. Shirokoff G. Simard M. Smith M. Soares-Santos F. Sobreira Z. Staniszewski A. A. Stark K. T. Story E. Suchyta M. E. C. Swanson G. Tarle D. Thomas M. A. Troxel D. L. Tucker K. Vanderlinde J. D. Vieira P. Vielzeuf V. Vikram A. R. Walker R. H. Wechsler J. Weller R. Williamson W. L. K. Wu B. Yanny O. Zahn Y. Zhang J. Zuntz (DES SPT Collaborations)
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords lensinggalaxyanalysisfunctionsjointtwo-pointcorrelationfield
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We perform a joint analysis of the auto and cross-correlations between three cosmic fields: the galaxy density field, the galaxy weak lensing shear field, and the cosmic microwave background (CMB) weak lensing convergence field. These three fields are measured using roughly 1300 sq. deg. of overlapping optical imaging data from first year observations of the Dark Energy Survey and millimeter-wave observations of the CMB from both the South Pole Telescope Sunyaev-Zel'dovich survey and Planck. We present cosmological constraints from the joint analysis of the two-point correlation functions between galaxy density and galaxy shear with CMB lensing. We test for consistency between these measurements and the DES-only two-point function measurements, finding no evidence for inconsistency in the context of flat $\Lambda$CDM cosmological models. Performing a joint analysis of five of the possible correlation functions between these fields (excluding only the CMB lensing autospectrum) yields $S_{8}\equiv \sigma_8\sqrt{\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3} = 0.782^{+0.019}_{-0.025}$ and $\Omega_{\rm m}=0.260^{+0.029}_{-0.019}$. We test for consistency between these five correlation function measurements and the Planck-only measurement of the CMB lensing autospectrum, again finding no evidence for inconsistency in the context of flat $\Lambda$CDM models. Combining constraints from all six two-point functions yields $S_{8}=0.776^{+0.014}_{-0.021}$ and $\Omega_{\rm m}= 0.271^{+0.022}_{-0.016}$. These results provide a powerful test and confirmation of the results from the first year DES joint-probes analysis.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing

    astro-ph.CO 2021-05 accept novelty 6.0

    DES Y3 3x2pt analysis constrains S8=0.776±0.017 and Ωm=0.339±0.032 in flat ΛCDM, consistent with Planck CMB results at p=0.13-0.48.