Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Framework for Telescope Schedulers: With Applications to the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1810.04815 v1 pith:GIXFPDTR submitted 2018-10-11 astro-ph.IM

classification astro-ph.IM
keywords schedulertelescopelargefeature-basedground-basedtextitalgorithmapplications
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

How ground-based telescopes schedule their observations in response to competing science priorities and constraints, variations in the weather, and the visibility of a particular part of the sky can significantly impact their efficiency. In this paper we introduce the Feature-Based telescope scheduler that is an automated, proposal-free decision making algorithm that offers \textit{controllability} of the behavior, \textit{adjustability} of the mission, and quick \textit{recoverability} from interruptions for large ground-based telescopes. By framing this scheduler in the context of a coherent mathematical model the functionality and performance of the algorithm is simple to interpret and adapt to a broad range of astronomical applications. This paper presents a generic version of the Feature-Based scheduler, with minimal manual tailoring, to demonstrate its potential and flexibility as a foundation for large ground-based telescope schedulers which can later be adjusted for other instruments. In addition, a modified version of the Feature-Based scheduler for the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) is introduced and compared to previous LSST scheduler simulations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. How much earlier would LSST have discovered currently known long-period comets?

    astro-ph.EP 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A simulated LSST-like survey would have discovered about 40% of known long-period comets at least five years before their perihelion, at roughly double the distance of their actual discovery.

  2. Multi-year Ground-Based Survey Photometry of Active Comet 103P/Hartley 2 and Centaur (2060) Chiron: A Tale of Two Comets in the Pre-LSST Era

    astro-ph.EP 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Reports asymmetric heliocentric activity slopes for 103P/Hartley 2 and exponential outburst decay plus flattening phase curves for Chiron from ATLAS, ZTF, and LCO photometry.

Pith tools