Pith. Sign in

RECORD

The Magnetic Fields of White Dwarfs in Cataclysmic Variables

Solar and Stellar Astrophysics · Submitted 15 Oct 2018

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Here we present population synthesis calculations showing that this hypothesis is supported by observations of magnetic binaries.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1810.06148 (version 1)
Pith IDIVVDRGR4, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationChristopher Tout, Dayal Wickramasinghe, Gordon Briggs, Lilia Ferrario. "The Magnetic Fields of White Dwarfs in Cataclysmic Variables." arXiv:1810.06148 (2018). https://pith.science/paper/IVVDRGR4
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,844 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.05 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.05 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.26 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The origin of magnetic fields in isolated and binary white dwarfs has been investigated in a series of recent papers. One proposal is that magnetic fields are generated through an alpha-omega dynamo during common envelope evolution. Here we present population synthesis calculations showing that this hypothesis is supported by observations of magnetic binaries.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The origin of magnetic fields in isolated and binary white dwarfs has been investigated in a series of recent papers. background 1.00 0.05 0.02 asserted 0.91
s1 One proposal is that magnetic fields are generated through an alpha-omega dynamo during common envelope evolution. background 1.00 0.04 0.04 hedged possibility 0.82
s2 Here we present population synthesis calculations showing that this hypothesis is supported by observations of magnetic binaries. result 0.54 0.92 0.92 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 0.99 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The origin of magnetic fields in isolated and binary white dwarfs has been investigated in a series of recent papers. One proposal is that magnetic fields are generated through an alpha-omega dynamo during common envelope evolution. Here we present population synthesis calculations showing that this hypothesis is supported by observations of magnetic binaries.

Human review
How the literature uses it

Papers whose main result relates to this one's

How each label was checked · JSON

Found among the papers closest to this one by title and main claim. Pith's classifier compared each pair's main results and a second model family confirmed the relation; checked against two further families, shown conflicts agreed 118 times in 120 and shown same results 218 times in 239. The quoted sentence is the other paper's main claim.

States a conflicting result 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.