Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Non-parametric Cosmology with Cosmic Shear

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics · Submitted 24 Oct 2018

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We find that below z = 0.4, the measured co-moving distance r (z) is higher than that expected from the Planck LCDM cosmology by ~1.5 sigma, while at higher redshifts, our reconstruction is fully consistent.

how it is stated · asserted 0.99 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1810.10552 (version 3)
Pith IDNMLYGH55, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationJason D. McEwen (MSSL/UCL), Peter L. Taylor (MSSL/UCL), Thomas D. Kitching (MSSL/UCL). "Non-parametric Cosmology with Cosmic Shear." arXiv:1810.10552 (2018). https://pith.science/paper/NMLYGH55
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,044 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.71 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.44 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.97 · compares with prior results 0.96 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We present a method to measure the growth of structure and the background geometry of the Universe -- with no a priori assumption about the underlying cosmological model. Using Canada-France-Hawaii Lensing Survey (CFHTLenS) shear data we simultaneously reconstruct the lensing amplitude, the linear intrinsic alignment amplitude, the redshift evolving matter power spectrum, P(k,z), and the co-moving distance, r(z). We find that lensing predominately constrains a single global power spectrum amplitude and several co-moving distance bins. Our approach can localise precise scales and redshifts where Lambda-Cold Dark Matter (LCDM) fails -- if any. We find that below z = 0.4, the measured co-moving distance r (z) is higher than that expected from the Planck LCDM cosmology by ~1.5 sigma, while at higher redshifts, our reconstruction is fully consistent. To validate our reconstruction, we compare LCDM parameter constraints from the standard cosmic shear likelihood analysis to those found by fitting to the non-parametric information and we find good agreement.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We present a method to measure the growth of structure and the background geometry of the Universe -- with no a priori assumption about the underlying cosmological model. contribution 0.99 0.92 0.08 asserted 0.99
s1 Using Canada-France-Hawaii Lensing Survey (CFHTLenS) shear data we simultaneously reconstruct the lensing amplitude, the linear intrinsic alignment amplitude, the redshift evolving matter power spectrum, P(k,z), and the co-moving distance, r(z). method 0.98 0.95 0.05 asserted 1.00
s2 We find that lensing predominately constrains a single global power spectrum amplitude and several co-moving distance bins. result 0.93 0.95 0.25 asserted 1.00
s3 Our approach can localise precise scales and redshifts where Lambda-Cold Dark Matter (LCDM) fails -- if any. contribution 0.72 0.37 0.10 hedged possibility 0.88
s4 We find that below z = 0.4, the measured co-moving distance r (z) is higher than that expected from the Planck LCDM cosmology by ~1.5 sigma, while at higher redshifts, our reconstruction is fully consistent. result 1.00 0.97 0.31 asserted 0.99
s5 To validate our reconstruction, we compare LCDM parameter constraints from the standard cosmic shear likelihood analysis to those found by fitting to the non-parametric information and we find good agreement. result 0.63 0.96 0.10 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.99 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We present a method to measure the growth of structure and the background geometry of the Universe -- with no a priori assumption about the underlying cosmological model. Using Canada-France-Hawaii Lensing Survey (CFHTLenS) shear data we simultaneously reconstruct the lensing amplitude, the linear intrinsic alignment amplitude, the redshift evolving matter power spectrum, P(k,z), and the co-moving distance, r(z). We find that lensing predominately constrains a single global power spectrum amplitude and several co-moving distance bins. Our approach can localise precise scales and redshifts where Lambda-Cold Dark Matter (LCDM) fails -- if any. We find that below z = 0.4, the measured co-moving distance r (z) is higher than that expected from the Planck LCDM cosmology by ~1.5 sigma, while at higher redshifts, our reconstruction is fully consistent. To validate our reconstruction, we compare LCDM parameter constraints from the standard cosmic shear likelihood analysis to those found by fitting to the non-parametric information and we find good agreement.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 5 sentences without a confident label

Compares with 1 paper
  • The LCDM prediction generated with the best fit parameters from both CFHTLenS [ref] and the Planck 2018 combined analysis (including BAO) [ref] are shown for comparison.

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters · Adaptive Grid Reconstruction · 0.98

Cites as background 4 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.