Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Marauder's Map of Security and Privacy in Machine Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1811.01134 v1 pith:HQY667GO submitted 2018-11-03 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords learningmachineprivacysecuritydirectionssystemsvulnerabilitiesalgorithms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

There is growing recognition that machine learning (ML) exposes new security and privacy vulnerabilities in software systems, yet the technical community's understanding of the nature and extent of these vulnerabilities remains limited but expanding. In this talk, we explore the threat model space of ML algorithms through the lens of Saltzer and Schroeder's principles for the design of secure computer systems. This characterization of the threat space prompts an investigation of current and future research directions. We structure our discussion around three of these directions, which we believe are likely to lead to significant progress. The first encompasses a spectrum of approaches to verification and admission control, which is a prerequisite to enable fail-safe defaults in machine learning systems. The second seeks to design mechanisms for assembling reliable records of compromise that would help understand the degree to which vulnerabilities are exploited by adversaries, as well as favor psychological acceptability of machine learning applications. The third pursues formal frameworks for security and privacy in machine learning, which we argue should strive to align machine learning goals such as generalization with security and privacy desiderata like robustness or privacy. Key insights resulting from these three directions pursued both in the ML and security communities are identified and the effectiveness of approaches are related to structural elements of ML algorithms and the data used to train them. We conclude by systematizing best practices in our community.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Adversarial Attacks on Reinforcement Learning-based Medical Questionnaire Systems: Input-level Perturbation Strategies and Medical Constraint Validation

    cs.CR 2025-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    On the NHIS mortality task, standard white-box attacks flip the final prediction of the AdaptiveFS RL questionnaire model in 33.1% (FGSM) to 64.7% (AutoAttack) of tested correctly classified cases.

Pith tools