Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Rigid potentials for cluster algebras from double Bruhat cells

Representation Theory · Submitted 4 Nov 2018

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim In this paper, we extend this result to the Berenstein-Fomin-Zelevinsky quivers corresponding to double Bruhat cells of symmetric Kac-Moody algebras.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1811.02428 (version 1)
Pith ID6EZX7UZM, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationMaitreyee C. Kulkarni. "Rigid potentials for cluster algebras from double Bruhat cells." arXiv:1811.02428 (2018). https://pith.science/paper/6EZX7UZM
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,920 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.07 · states limitation 0.05 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.03 · compares with prior results 0.90 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Buan, Iyama, Reiten and Smith proved that the superpotential of a quiver corresponding to an element of Coxeter group is rigid. In this paper, we extend this result to the Berenstein-Fomin-Zelevinsky quivers corresponding to double Bruhat cells of symmetric Kac-Moody algebras. We also realize these quivers as dimers models on cylinder over corresponding graphs.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Buan, Iyama, Reiten and Smith proved that the superpotential of a quiver corresponding to an element of Coxeter group is rigid. background 1.00 0.02 0.04 asserted 1.00
s1 In this paper, we extend this result to the Berenstein-Fomin-Zelevinsky quivers corresponding to double Bruhat cells of symmetric Kac-Moody algebras. contribution 0.87 0.92 0.79 asserted 1.00
s2 We also realize these quivers as dimers models on cylinder over corresponding graphs. contribution 0.72 0.93 0.08 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.96.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Buan, Iyama, Reiten and Smith proved that the superpotential of a quiver corresponding to an element of Coxeter group is rigid. In this paper, we extend this result to the Berenstein-Fomin-Zelevinsky quivers corresponding to double Bruhat cells of symmetric Kac-Moody algebras. We also realize these quivers as dimers models on cylinder over corresponding graphs.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 8 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
Cites as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.