Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Resolving on 100 pc scales the UV-continuum in Lyman-$\alpha$ emitters between redshift 2 to 3 with gravitational lensing

Astrophysics of Galaxies · Submitted 8 Nov 2018

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim This morphology is consistent with disk-like structures of star-formation for more than half of the sample.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.96 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1811.03628 (version 1)
Pith IDJF4POWXF, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationE. Ritondale, J. P. McKean, M. W. Auger, S. Vegetti. "Resolving on 100 pc scales the UV-continuum in Lyman-$\alpha$ emitters between redshift 2 to 3 with gravitational lensing." arXiv:1811.03628 (2018). https://pith.science/paper/JF4POWXF
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 7,868 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.94 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.08 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.32 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We present a study of seventeen LAEs at redshift 2$<z<$3 gravitationally lensed by massive early-type galaxies (ETGs) at a mean redshift of approximately 0.5. Using a fully Bayesian grid-based technique, we model the gravitational lens mass distributions with elliptical power-law profiles and reconstruct the UV-continuum surface brightness distributions of the background sources using pixellated source models. We find that the deflectors are close to, but not consistent with isothermal models in almost all cases, at the $2\sigma$-level. We take advantage of the lensing magnification (typically $\mu\simeq$ 20) to characterise the physical and morphological properties of these LAE galaxies. From reconstructing the ultra-violet continuum emission, we find that the star-formation rates range from 0.3 to 8.5 M$_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$ and that the galaxies are typically composed of several compact and diffuse components, separated by 0.4 to 4 kpc. Moreover, they have peak star-formation rate intensities that range from 2.1 to 54.1 M$_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-2}$. These galaxies tend to be extended with major axis ranging from 0.2 to 1.8 kpc (median 561 pc), and with a median ellipticity of 0.49. This morphology is consistent with disk-like structures of star-formation for more than half of the sample. However, for at least two sources, we also find off-axis components that may be associated with mergers. Resolved kinematical information will be needed to confirm the disk-like nature and possible merger scenario for the LAEs in the sample.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We present a study of seventeen LAEs at redshift 2$<z<$3 gravitationally lensed by massive early-type galaxies (ETGs) at a mean redshift of approximately 0.5. contribution 1.00 0.86 0.04 asserted 0.99
s1 Using a fully Bayesian grid-based technique, we model the gravitational lens mass distributions with elliptical power-law profiles and reconstruct the UV-continuum surface brightness distributions of the background sources using pixellated source models. method 1.00 0.97 0.03 asserted 0.98
s2 We find that the deflectors are close to, but not consistent with isothermal models in almost all cases, at the $2\sigma$-level. result 1.00 0.95 0.09 asserted 0.99
s3 We take advantage of the lensing magnification (typically $\mu\simeq$ 20) to characterise the physical and morphological properties of these LAE galaxies. method 0.61 0.83 0.05 asserted 0.98
s4 From reconstructing the ultra-violet continuum emission, we find that the star-formation rates range from 0.3 to 8.5 M$_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$ and that the galaxies are typically composed of several compact and diffuse components, separated by 0.4 to 4 kpc. result 1.00 0.98 0.24 asserted 1.00
s5 Moreover, they have peak star-formation rate intensities that range from 2.1 to 54.1 M$_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-2}$. result 1.00 0.96 0.07 asserted 1.00
s6 These galaxies tend to be extended with major axis ranging from 0.2 to 1.8 kpc (median 561 pc), and with a median ellipticity of 0.49. result 1.00 0.95 0.12 asserted 0.98
s7 This morphology is consistent with disk-like structures of star-formation for more than half of the sample. interpretation 0.93 0.91 0.18 hedged possibility 0.96
s8 However, for at least two sources, we also find off-axis components that may be associated with mergers. result 0.96 0.97 0.05 hedged possibility 0.98
s9 Resolved kinematical information will be needed to confirm the disk-like nature and possible merger scenario for the LAEs in the sample. future work 0.93 0.14 0.08 hedged possibility 0.55

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.64.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We present a study of seventeen LAEs at redshift 2$<z<$3 gravitationally lensed by massive early-type galaxies (ETGs) at a mean redshift of approximately 0.5. Using a fully Bayesian grid-based technique, we model the gravitational lens mass distributions with elliptical power-law profiles and reconstruct the UV-continuum surface brightness distributions of the background sources using pixellated source models. We find that the deflectors are close to, but not consistent with isothermal models in almost all cases, at the $2\sigma$-level. We take advantage of the lensing magnification (typically $\mu\simeq$ 20) to characterise the physical and morphological properties of these LAE galaxies. From reconstructing the ultra-violet continuum emission, we find that the star-formation rates range from 0.3 to 8.5 M$_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$ and that the galaxies are typically composed of several compact and diffuse components, separated by 0.4 to 4 kpc. Moreover, they have peak star-formation rate intensities that range from 2.1 to 54.1 M$_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-2}$. These galaxies tend to be extended with major axis ranging from 0.2 to 1.8 kpc (median 561 pc), and with a median ellipticity of 0.49. This morphology is consistent with disk-like structures of star-formation for more than half of the sample. However, for at least two sources, we also find off-axis components that may be associated with mergers. Resolved kinematical information will be needed to confirm the disk-like nature and possible merger scenario for the LAEs in the sample.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

2 arXiv papers cite this in 2 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 1 sentence without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 1 paper

What it cites

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.