Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Resolving the Feedback Bottleneck of Multi-Antenna Coded Caching

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1811.03935 v2 pith:H6RJOYL7 submitted 2018-11-09 cs.IT math.IT

classification cs.ITmath.IT
keywords feedbackcachingcostsgainsmulti-antennagammaoptimalperformance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Multi-antenna cache-aided wireless networks have been known to suffer from a severe feedback bottleneck, where achieving the maximal Degrees-of-Freedom (DoF) performance required feedback from all served users. These costs matched the caching gains and thus scaled with the number of users. In the context of the $L$-antenna MISO broadcast channel with $K$ receivers having normalized cache size $\gamma$, we pair a fundamentally novel algorithm together with a new information-theoretic converse, and identify the optimal tradeoff between feedback costs and DoF performance, by showing that having CSIT from only $C<L$ served users implies an optimal one-shot linear DoF of $C+K\gamma$. As a side consequence of this, we also now understand that the well known DoF performance $L+K\gamma$ is in fact exactly optimal. In practice, the above means that we are now able to disentangle caching gains from feedback costs, thus achieving unbounded caching gains at the mere feedback cost of the multiplexing gain. This further solidifies the role of caching in boosting multi-antenna systems; caching now can provide unbounded DoF gains over multi-antenna downlink systems, at no additional feedback costs. The above results are extended to also include the corresponding multiple transmitter scenario with caches at both ends.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools