Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Heuristic Voting as Ordinal Dominance Strategies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1811.05529 v1 pith:BJWF2F32 submitted 2018-11-13 cs.GT

classification cs.GT
keywords strategiesvotingallowsapproachdecisionhierarchyprobabilitiessets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Decision making under uncertainty is a key component of many AI settings, and in particular of voting scenarios where strategic agents are trying to reach a joint decision. The common approach to handle uncertainty is by maximizing expected utility, which requires a cardinal utility function as well as detailed probabilistic information. However, often such probabilities are not easy to estimate or apply. To this end, we present a framework that allows "shades of gray" of likelihood without probabilities. Specifically, we create a hierarchy of sets of world states based on a prospective poll, with inner sets contain more likely outcomes. This hierarchy of likelihoods allows us to define what we term ordinally-dominated strategies. We use this approach to justify various known voting heuristics as bounded-rational strategies.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools