Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Second Quantization of Scattering Modes of Absorptive Photonic Nanostructures

Optics · Submitted 16 Nov 2018

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The natural emergence of both absorptive loss and fluctuations without introducing a thermal bath is demonstrated.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1811.06757 (version 1)
Pith IDRX7PJXAB, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationCarsten Rockstuhl, Jakob Straubel, Jens Oppermann, Karolina S{\l}owik. "Second Quantization of Scattering Modes of Absorptive Photonic Nanostructures." arXiv:1811.06757 (2018). https://pith.science/paper/RX7PJXAB
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,866 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.08 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.09 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We present a quantization scheme for optical systems with absorptive losses, based on an expansion in the complete set of scattering solutions to Maxwell's equations. The natural emergence of both absorptive loss and fluctuations without introducing a thermal bath is demonstrated. Our model predicts mechanisms of absorption induced squeezing and dispersion mediated photon conversion.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We present a quantization scheme for optical systems with absorptive losses, based on an expansion in the complete set of scattering solutions to Maxwell's equations. contribution 0.83 0.94 0.18 asserted 1.00
s1 The natural emergence of both absorptive loss and fluctuations without introducing a thermal bath is demonstrated. result 0.93 0.89 0.31 asserted 1.00
s2 Our model predicts mechanisms of absorption induced squeezing and dispersion mediated photon conversion. result 0.92 0.85 0.36 asserted 0.94

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.69 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We present a quantization scheme for optical systems with absorptive losses, based on an expansion in the complete set of scattering solutions to Maxwell's equations. The natural emergence of both absorptive loss and fluctuations without introducing a thermal bath is demonstrated. Our model predicts mechanisms of absorption induced squeezing and dispersion mediated photon conversion.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.